Case for the Defense Day 10

Three weeks after the police 'assessment' of the Savile claims started, Cddr Spindler told us that, SEVEN complaints had been made against Sir Jimmy before his death.
 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/seven-alleged-jimmy-savile-victims-made-complaints-while-he-was-alive-8228608.html
FOUR of these from Duncroft, TWO hearsay because the FILES he refers to, do NOT appear to exist and one emanating from Jersey.
Jersey ? Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, such claims were ever made about Sir Jimmy in Jersey. How do I know this ? Well, the man who ran the Haute de la Garenne investigation confirmed this

But, this is October 2012  so Harper added a caveat to his previous findings. The Metropolitan Police and the media say Jimmy is a criminal, so EVERYTHING that we know about the man up to and including this time is wrong, leading him to concede !

And then, as if to add insult to retrospective injury, comes this 

 Surely the word NOW should be added to the header from the article dated 9th October 2012 !

counrty

Exhibit 20 previous investigatory blog post into the Jersey connection 
http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2013_10_01_archive.html
Commander Spindler was not joking when he said that 'we're in a watershed moment for child abuse investigation, and Operation Yewtree will be a landmark investigation."
We certainly were Cddr Spindler because now we have SENIOR POLICEMEN in the UK colluding and/or attempting to PERVERT the course of Natural Justice in this country by applying retrospective GUILT when NO new evidence 'cept a change of MINDSET, exists as good grounds for doing so !
 http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/oct/08/jimmy-savile-jersey-childrens-home

Now, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury let me take you, if I may back to another, albeit smaller, criminal investigation, this time in 2003, this time involving Sir Jimmy's second home and eventual resting place, Scarborough !
Again I shall be requesting that you bear with me because, not having  EQUALITY of ARMS in terms of access to information, I have found it difficult to establish what the media (and others) were on about when they produced this sensational headline from the Daily Express 28th October 2012

 
 Yes Ladies and Gentlemen, as I searched for any stories relating to Savile in 2003 I came across this nonsense. Now, we must bear in mind that investigations into North Yorkshire Police relating to what they knew or didn't know about this alleged abuse back then continue as we speak, but my submission rests solely on the media's ongoing attempts to LINK JIMMY SAVILE to any report of abuse, no matter how old, no matter how sensational.
Now, here is what witnesses say in October 2012 !

A 'suspect' ? Is that so ? Not according to North Yorkshire Police 

Eighteen months later, the NYP release a press statement indicating that they have referred themselves to the IPCC, but I am not interested in this aspect of the case against Sir Jimmy. This issue has been seized on by various groupings who, like the BBC baiters have their own agenda's at heart. I will merely submit the FACTS that I have uncovered about the 2003 investigation !
Exhibit 21 and 22 from 8th March 3003 and 4th February 2004 respectively !

Now, lets go back to that Daily Express article dated 28th October 2012 hot on the heals of the reportage from local press the previous week. The two men above were named therein. It continued !

'Gossip' Ladies and gentlemen, there's another word we come across repeatedly in relation to the Savile allegations. But, my question to the local paper and indeed North Yorkshire Police would be, 'have these two anonymous women made any further contact since October 23rd 2012 ?
As for the allegations themselves, I ask you Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. WHY, would NYP not have taken claims made against Sir Jimmy seriously in 2003 when other claims made 4 years later led to a TWO year investigation by Surrey Police, the result being 'insufficient evidence to proceed' ?
And whilst we are in North Yorkshire, just how many accusations have since been made ? 

The writer of this conspiracy piece from October 31st 2012 got his response in June 2014. Sir Jimmy was investigated by York  Teaching Hospital Trust in regard to this complaint by an ex nurse ! 

 Laughable is it not Ladies and Gentlemen !

 Perhaps Sir Jimmy should have asked her if she wanted coffee instead of tea !

And, on that note, time for a well deserved break !

http://www.thescarboroughnews.co.uk/news/local/damning-savile-report-published-1-6695548