Pages

Sunday, 22 March 2015

£3K for you £16K for them !

Goodness gracious, one of our three settled compositors is not happy. HE, is not happy at all. WHY ? well, because he only got a couple of grand for something HE says has affected his life for 40 years. 
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3006017/Jimmy-Savile-victim-abused-10-year-old-gets-just-3-000-compensation-NHS-lawyers-rake-16-000.html
Just £3,000 ? Let's look at the tariff agreed on these claims shall we ?
Then let's look for Mr A in Lampard. This must be him on P42
What's interesting about this story is that it involves an alleged witness, none other than Jimmy's PA Janet Cope. A fact that is NOT mentioned in the press article. Ashton made a police report to Yewtree cops, surely they questioned Ms Cope ? Just another thing we are NOT ALLOWED to know. Although this guy has broken cover now. He has waived his right to anonymity. Let the game commence !
Do you believe him ?  Naturally, I don't but it was good day for some personal injury lawyer the name of which we are NOT told. They obviously did their best for Mr A because he only has GOOD words to say about THEM ! 
No, mate, because in a real court, you'd have to furnish some CREDIBLE evidence, not this baloney. Didn't your laywer told you how much you would get ? Didn't they tell you how much THEY would get ?

Meanwhile in la la Lawyer land !
Thanks to 'Misa' for informing me about this story. You just couldn't, make it up, could YOU !

 

9 comments:

  1. Making it up is easy, making money hungry Lawyers believe it is even easier!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Especially as they cannot answer a straight question themselves. Ms Dux NEVER did reveal the page number for that 8 yr old girl, at SMH in 1986. WHY ? who knows BUT I say that puts her and her company in a very poor light. The least she could do is explain.

      Delete
  2. That last quote about the "caring" is engendering imagery in my mind of the young ingenue just arrived in Soho or Reno, and meeting their new pimp or Brothel Keeper for the first time.

    "We'll look after you dearie. You'll be safe with us." Kerrrr-ching.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the...er..thanks, Rabbit.

    Fair play to this guy - one, he's prepared to show his face; two, he appears to have been able to demonstrate that he was in a position to have met Jimmy Savile. That puts him well ahead of the pack, in my book.

    I'm just not clear why he wouldn't have raised the matter with a member of staff, like...his mother, for example.

    Unrelated: I see tw*t has his name on an article about royal/paedo/horror/cover up over that the mirror. He must have got fifty quid for that.
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ex-cop-claims-royal-paedophile-ring-5379159

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Misa, I'm fairly certain I could demonstrate being in a position to meet Jimmy during my lifetime ! Convincing a PI lawyer and convincing a jury are two completely different thing. Jimmy abusing boys, that just takes the biscuit IMHO.

      Delete
  4. Misa, sorry but I hit the delete button instead of publish. Can u re-send please ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe it's been estabilished, perhaps by a criminologist, that Jimmy's MO was to do anyone, anywhere, anytime and in any which way you can think of (I think that's the 'pattern' that Mr Hunt was referring to). So if you can't be bothered to trip on a loose paving stone and sue the council, or feel it too '70s for your liking, and you don't want to stage a minor traffic accicent and claim against the insurance for whiplash (perhaps that would be just too '90s for you), then you could still be onto a winner. Just call our histrionic abuse line to find out whether you were tickled any time in the last 60 years. You know it makes sense.

      Delete
  5. https://youtu.be/oOS0g6Eu3R0?t=16s

    Says it all really!

    ReplyDelete