Fleet Street are out for the Operation Midland accusers, 'Nick' and Esther Baker. The articles have been coming thick and fast. Here's bits of the latest one from today's Sunday Times
You can pay to read the whole thing here if you like. Alternatively, you can read the bits I picked out, as of particular interest to me !
I've already tweeted my interest to the author - James Gillespie. Let's see if he reads this, and responds accordingly !
I really shouldn't have to ask Gillespie to read my blogs, should I ? Anyone with a stem and a brain attached to it, can work out the point I'm making. Nevertheless, here goes -
The first point I should like to make is this -
WHY shouldn't someone in a secure psychiatric patient be granted Core Participant Status in Alexis Jay's IICSA gig ? OK, I see where he's going with this, and I agree with him. But, wasn't an ex-Broadmoor patient deemed a credible witness, when it came to Savile ?
Next, further dismantling of Esther LOL
So, one alleged victim, is attacking another ? Welcome to twitter Mr Gillespie. Where have you been this past six years ?
Now. listen up, because JG's making sense isn't he ? The claims against the late Lord Janner in the civil courts, have been dropped. But they will be ventilated again and again in the course of the Jay IICSA charade, unless these people are removed as Core Participants, or arrested, which would be my preference, and charged with attempting to pervert ...
Next Gillespie identifies Tom Watson's involvement in the matter.
And, what 'evidence' did have upon which to base his subsequent campaign ? Well, very little according to JG
The Police adopted a flawed approach ? The same 'approach' they'd used in Operation Yewtree, as it happens !
Read that last paragraph again, and tell me what's wrong with it ? Hundreds of witnesses DID NOT come forward during ANY investigation. We know this, because, there was NO Police investigation. The Police merely encouraged 'victims', not 'witnesses' not complainants, but 'victims' to 'come forward'. They struggled to get very many in the first few days. Then an added incentive came along - MONEY ! Just a week after Exposure aired, the fragrant Liz appeared on our screens and across the airwaves !
Strange, how that 'page' in Slater and Gordon's history appears to have been wiped !
Are you getting my drift Mr Gillespie ?
Another bell not ringing for you Mr Gillespie ? What evidence beyond the unsubstantiated accounts of a handful of individuals and fantasists' has anyone produced substantiating ANY of Savile claims ?
And there's also the matter of the part you yourself played in this nonsense. Remember this ?