Pages

Friday, 20 April 2018

The Instigator

Mark Williams-Thomas has been reveling in the praise his latest TV show has attracted. Least-ways, that's what was going down a few days ago when I burrowed into his Twitter TL. It's all here for them not blocked by our hero 

https://twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas?lang=en 

No one has ever been able to successfully pin down the exact reason  why Mouthwash as I call him, left Surrey Police. His wiki page has been updated more times than Jack the Ripper's, but wait .... the lowest of the low plumb new depths to bring us their take on 'Mark' The Investigator !


Much as I hate including this filthy rag on my blog, I'll wash my hands when I finish typing, it's useful reinforcing the adage - judge people by their 'friends'. That these useless beings are still peddling this nonsense, doesn't beggar belief does it ? 'lead many investigations' ?


Anyways enough of the here and nowish, today I want to focus my attentions on Mouthwash's true claim to fame. The one skill we actually KNOW he possesses and uses freely regardless of the consequences for others. Ladies and Gentlemen, sit back, and read all about Mark Williams-Thomas - The Instigator. 


Yes, here's Mouthwash in the TV show that made him a household implement - Exposure - the other side of Jimmy Savile. story of Fiona is a long one, but in short for those who cannot be bothered to read five years of blog posts, this is basically her :

She was one of the two allegedly ex-Duncroft women who agreed to do on-camera interviews claiming that Jimmy Savile was a child abuser. The two who actually met him that is. Only problem for Fiona and her enabler, being that she's a proven liar. She may have met Savile, but crucially NOT at the relevant time for the purposes of the Savile stitch-up. Read this for starters 

http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/honestly-mark.html

Even the publication of half-facts



c

MWT had no choice but to keep his most valuable Savile assets sweet did he ? Imagine Fiona or her pals deciding to break tradition and tell the truth about their obvious lies ? 

But I digress, after all, who cares about the truth especially where it concerns the dead ? And now, here's we things get interesting in two words : Cliff Richard !

Cliff is currently suing the BBC. You can read all about that elsewhere, everywhere in fact, apart from on MWT's twitter account that is. To be sure, his silence on the matter is deafening, given his interest and actual involvement in Sir Cliff's downfall ! He was after all advising Cliff's first accuser 


 Cliff's home was raided by Police on August 14th 2014. A few days later Cliff's friends came out for him in this article. Note MWT's comment



 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/17/bbc-cliff-richard-witch-hunt-live-raid-broadcast

The question everyone wants answering is : who leaked the fact that the raid was taking place to the BBC ? Not South Yorkshire police say the BBC



But, rather confusingly 



https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/17/bbc-cliff-richard-witch-hunt-live-raid-broadcast

Meanwhile, in MWT land



 Next day - the accusers were said to be growing in numbers !






So basically, here's the deal : Cliff's accuser watched MWT's exposure of Sir Jimmy Savile. Doubtless, he spots an opportunity for some attention and/or cash and contacts the former 'detective'. Former Surrey Police officer MWT passes this information to the Savile cops, then hears fuck all, until low and behold - the cops raid Sir Cliff's place. 

So, what was happening from the summer of 2013 or thereabouts when it's claimed the accuser allegedly first contacted MWT and that day in August 2014 ? Here's a taster of activity on his twitter account around that time. Those of you NOT blocked by him might do a whole lot better than me, just google twitter advanced search and away you go.




He's not completely without some sense is he ? He's been very careful NOT to make any claims about Cliff since the latter decided to start suing people. But, he just couldn't resist tweeting all sorts of crap in the interim, keeping the allegations alive and inferring that the investigation bore weight. 


 Homework for someone - look up any further exchanges between 'Chantal' and Mouthwash. 


And there's so much more ! But, that's enough for me guys and gals. Some day Mouthwash will have to answer for the damage he's done, and as my standing friend often says - we can wait !

Ooops I almost forgot - this made me laugh out loud. Not everyone's impressed by the great investigator ! Thank you Digital Spy 






6 comments:

  1. It's interesting what MWT says and doesn't say. Have you seen his IMDb biography and selected quotes, Rabbit? Written by "Anonymous", so perhaps not him, but one would think he might have some influence on what appears on that page.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Rabbit, do you really know the family ? Because there's a young girl who found out she is related to them and is trying to find them and get in touch with them for some time now. She lives in Leeds and had made a twitter account solely to communicate with the relatives in private and a follow request was sent to Moor (David Dugmore) in April (the girl's profile has a yellow dragon on the picture) because he talks to Amanda and Damien. Amanda is her biological cousin, don't know who Damien is.
    Do you know of a lady named Joan or Joyce ? A note had been left by the girl at a local cafe leaving her contact details where the lady is a regular customer and was a friend of the girl's neighbor who knew she is a relative and told the girl. If you do know the family please tell them there's a young girl who is trying to get in touch with them and she has also been badly affected by all of this. She had gotten very bad anxiety and depression because of it and she hasn't yet met any of her biological relatives on either side yet so she is really struggling and needs alot of closure.

    If you or the family know of Joan or Joyce and the area she lives in, the girl lives only half a mile away. Please let them know everything I have told you. Thank-you.


    Angela

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Angela, before we speak, how is this young girl related to me, who are her parents? Naturally I have to be very careful so if you could tell me as much as possible on here and the circumstances of her recently finding out she's my cousin. Kind regards Amanda

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I recall some folk linked to the original Duncroft forum groups thought I was someone called David Dugmore at one time (years ago) - I'm not.

      Delete
    2. Hi Amanda

      I understand how you feel since there have been people falsely claiming to be relatives and have gone public with it trying to claim money, which we can all agree is disgusting. This is genuine with proof and she only wishes for full closure in private and support for everyone. There are alot of details but we can discuss only what you're comfortable with here as it is a family matter on a public blog.

      She was adopted as a baby as her mother was very ill around the time she was born. She grew up in Leeds and never met her mother nor father or any biological relatives so in 2014 once an adult had traced back her roots and found that on her paternal side are Saviles and that one of your uncles is her father which understandably is very shocking.

      She became very depressed and kept it secret for 3 years until a friend told her of Joan / Joyce who visits a local cafe regularly close to her home and had mentioned is a relative of SJS, presumably a neice as she is said to be in her 50s. The girl then confided to her friend that she's also a relative and they both went to the Cafe looking for Joan / Joyce but she hasn't been in for a while so left a note with her contact details with the manager. This was in February and she has heard nothing back.

      She's more than happy to take a DNA test to prove everything is true and wishes for anything that will give the family closure and support with a huge thanks to Rabbit, Moor and all the other people who are helping to clear SJS's name but she also said she would understand if you wouldn't want to get involved because of all the things that have happened and she wouldn't want to be a reminder of it. It's a very sensitive situation and everyone needs to be comfortable especially if things were to be discussed further. Hopefully this information helps you feel more at ease and gave you the answers you were looking for.


      Thankyou.

      Delete
  4. Hi Angela

    Apologies as I've only just seen this, I was checking the newer blogs for your reply.

    I guess I'm still very curious as all my Aunts and Uncles would be in their 90's and several well over a 100. As she is a "young girl" I was assuming if her Savile parent was more likely to be a cousin. I'm actually the youngest member of the family and I'm in my mid 50's.Joan was my Mum but she died in 1999, there is no Joyce in the family.

    I really don't know how I can communicate with you in private unless you are happy to give me an email address. I obviously know how incredibly difficult being a family member is and my heart breaks for her that this situation has made her ill.

    I'll try my best to help but I'm still struggling with her age Vs the age of my Uncles. Amanda

    ReplyDelete