A few days ago someone had the presence of mind to publish CBF's Polygraph test along with a printed statement regarding an incident in which she claims Federal Judge Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her.
https://www.scribd.com/document/389529497/Read-Ford-polygraph-report#from_embed
I immediately noticed some discrepancies between the handwritten notes and the typed version of events. They're not much in themselves but then one starts burrowing and well, all sorts of holes start appearing - pun intended - everywhere !
In her original letter to Sen Feinstein Ford dated July 30th 2008 she claimed there were just five people including her at the gathering at which the alleged attack took place
https://www.vox.com/2018/9/16/17867706/christine-blasey-ford-brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-allegations
Her handwritten note dated 7th August 2018 says 4 boys and a couple of girls, I expect not including her !
So what you might say, and I might agree if it weren't for where these documents led me next, to the Daily Mail for God's sake ! Yes REALLY !
You see, I've read her statements, I've heard her testimony (some of it) but what I haven't seen so far is any physical proof that what she's saying is accurate ! Notice I didn't use the word 'true' ? I'm getting a tad wiser in my old age (since yesterday). CBF may well have told her therapist and her husband that Brett Kavanaugh was her assailant, but unless I see those notes, it's just her word, and that's not enough for me !
Ford's detractors say she only brought BK into her assault story, when she discovered he'd been nominated for the Supreme Court a few months ago, but Ford is adamant that she told her husband during a couple's counselling session in 2012. It had to be 2012 because that's when she had to explain why she wanted an extra/new/second door in her home !
could not be understood ? Does this mean her husband was unaware of her issues regarding confinement, in 2012 ? The next bit (from yesterday) is even more bizarre !
She recalled that someday the boy who assaulted her 'could someday be on the US Supreme Court' ? Really - she was saying this in 2012 ? Sorry folks, but I don't believe this and I hope you don't either ! But hold on, for a moment, I'm not alone in my door fetish (I've been questioning her references to the need for extra doors for days), there is intelligent life in the media ! Please someone - give a round of applause to Dr Ford's local missive - the PA Post
Anyone else see Dr Ford's problem here ? This extra door was fitted in 2008 by which time her husband should have got used to her special needs in the door department, so it's highly unlikely they'd be arguing about it four years later.
Unless, they were short of cash that is ! But that's another story, I'm knackered .
To be continued ! Oh but before I go, someone explain to me why Ford's lawyers are withholding her therapy notes ? Maybe the FBI will tell us !
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6211925/Christine-Ford-passed-Kavanaugh-polygraph-test-lawyers-REFUSE-hand-therapy-notes.html
And, what does she mean by this ? She's received 'medical treatment'
Is she considering a civil claim ?
Oh, and you might want to look up these guys too !
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/ford-caught-in-major-lie-city-remodeling-permits-show-project-she-linked-to-kavanaugh-was-in-2008-not-2012/
Well spotted. Has anyone else noticed this? Is it possible that she got the permission in 2008 but didn't actually do the work until four years later, or did they renovate the house twice?
ReplyDeleteVery interesting! It will be interesting to see what the FBI's conclusions are.
ReplyDelete