tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post5266711976744700324..comments2024-03-13T21:05:01.752+00:00Comments on Justice For Jimmy Savile: Mandy Tory Reporting !Rabbitawayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07481932585279733096noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-65283761239907042592014-04-08T00:08:52.809+01:002014-04-08T00:08:52.809+01:00Indeed, the pretend charities and starmites are ex...Indeed, the pretend charities and starmites are exploiting a real case to push through their badly thought out 'law' and that I find dispicable. On a positive note, there was quite an interesting response to Starmer's radio 4 gig from the legal fraternity on twitter. We are not alone, perhaps the ex DPP won't what he wants so easily after all !Rabbitawayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07481932585279733096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-73626818056709517122014-04-07T23:51:39.056+01:002014-04-07T23:51:39.056+01:00I noticed that one of the petitioners the politica...I noticed that one of the petitioners the politicals are clustering around is riding on the back of the dreadful case of the little Polish boy. Given that in that case the little fellow had been surrounded by social workers and all the paraphernalia of the modern State, I'm really struggling to see what relevance that case has to a law supposedly challenging the keeping of secrets. The Something must be done syndrome I guess.<br /><br />Any law supported by NAPAC has my No vote against it anyway, simply on the basis that whatever they support is almost certainly bogus.Moor Larkinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05275057917684784541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-42081288367692046552014-04-07T22:05:35.930+01:002014-04-07T22:05:35.930+01:00The proponents say nothing about the finer details...The proponents say nothing about the finer details of their planned law e.g what happens after someone reports etc etc. How can they not want to share this information with the general public ? Have they even considered the ramifications ? Rabbitawayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07481932585279733096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-12720084309632685892014-04-07T20:46:02.377+01:002014-04-07T20:46:02.377+01:00How could anyone object to mandatory reporting? Es...How could anyone object to mandatory reporting? Especially when it is linked to the issue of "child abuse". <br /><br />The problem will begin though when somebody is taken to court and it is alleged that they MUST have been aware of a crime. When they then say, "But I saw no crime occur" then they will be accused of lying and be prosecuted for this crime of not reporting something that they never knew about in the first place.<br /><br />You have already seen this in the general sense with the thousands and thousands of people who used to work for the BBC over fifty years who MUST have known what Savile was up to, but covered it up by not telling what they knew. Now take this out of the realm of mere press bullshit and hand it over to legal sharks like Slaver & Gorgon for example. Someone such as Savile's old Producers and colleagues would undoubtedly be liable to prosecution and quite likely be deemed guilty of NOT reporting what the Spindler Police have PROVED was going on....... <br /><br />Stands to reason.... doesn't it?Moor Larkinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05275057917684784541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-4463112251770688822014-04-07T19:34:03.516+01:002014-04-07T19:34:03.516+01:00No, but they was in one of the tweets u responded ...No, but they was in one of the tweets u responded to Margaret. They don't like discussing their data do they ? Rabbitawayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07481932585279733096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-51252911805310057252014-04-07T19:27:46.638+01:002014-04-07T19:27:46.638+01:00Weird - just checked and I'm blocked by @manda...Weird - just checked and I'm blocked by @mandatenow. Never said a word against them.maggie jervishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10173776188214366148noreply@blogger.com