tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post7666944284303470173..comments2024-03-13T21:05:01.752+00:00Comments on Justice For Jimmy Savile: Case for the Defense Day 5 PM session Rabbitawayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07481932585279733096noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-29197868801749791712014-09-17T00:44:07.702+01:002014-09-17T00:44:07.702+01:00No wonder S&G wanted RJ&W. They got the co...No wonder S&G wanted RJ&W. They got the cops thrown in for free... <br />No Plebs allowed.<br />http://www.slatergordon.co.uk/police-law/Moor Larkinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05275057917684784541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-51661189646151766292014-09-12T19:56:48.751+01:002014-09-12T19:56:48.751+01:00LOL, rabbit, I've said it before, and I'll...LOL, rabbit, I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if everyone else is allowed to just make stuff up, I don't see why I should be excluded ;) In general terms, my fantasies are far more plausible than theirs. I bet JS would have made a great cat burglar, I mean he was extremely fit and agile and very clever. He had the perfect cover, coming up to London for a couple of days a week, knocking over a pad on Cheyne Row, or Chelsea, then scooting back to Leeds to do a fun run. It's obvious that he funded his charitable endeavours with the proceeds of his London crime sprees, because didn't Robin Hood actually come from Yorkshire, just like Jimmy? I rest my case. Take that, Liz Dux ;)PDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-86757974147985487922014-09-12T11:11:59.835+01:002014-09-12T11:11:59.835+01:00PD are you Martina Cole ? :-) PD are you Martina Cole ? :-) Rabbitawayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07481932585279733096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-76250011408970184972014-09-11T22:24:36.143+01:002014-09-11T22:24:36.143+01:00Moor is right - what's so blindingly deranged ...Moor is right - what's so blindingly deranged about all of this is that the allegations have never been tested, whether in a court of law, or by the standards reputable researchers and historians would apply to investigating the past. I've read the NHS reports and they consist of nothing but a record of what the complainants said, with no attempt to establish whether the allegations were empirically possible, much less true or sufficiently well-founded to be plausible. One thing that occurred to me was that insurance companies would be a dam' sight more suspicious and on the ball if faced with a slew of similar claims, involving cars, say, or yachts or real property. I very much doubt they would say "Well a whole bunch of people must have been burgled by the Top of the Pops crew because their stories are so similar, who can doubt them? At least 500 householders are telling us that Jimmy Savile had a secret life as London's top cat burglar, and where do you think he got his jingle-jangle joolery from? Dave Lee Travis was the muscle, and Paul "Baby-Face" Gambaccino was used to case the joint, prior to breaking-in, because of his innocent appearance. We now know that Anne Nightingale acted as fence." PDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-51466201158718156972014-09-11T22:00:52.879+01:002014-09-11T22:00:52.879+01:00Wonder which law firm Jim's mate was referring...Wonder which law firm Jim's mate was referring to ? Rabbitawayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07481932585279733096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7026409546307773708.post-17206453421549381922014-09-11T20:59:30.296+01:002014-09-11T20:59:30.296+01:00Lawyers are at the heart of all of this. Starmer s...Lawyers are at the heart of all of this. Starmer streamlined the law and simply declared that "victims must be believed". Who would argue with a "victim" being believed? The trouble is that you can only have a victim if there is a crime, and in the absence of any crime there are no victims to be believed. What we are faced with is a legal system, including a police force, that declares a crime has been committed if someone says it has. The legals are simply taking advantage of a corrupt legal framework, and by doing so they behave with the same degree of corruption. They excuse themselves by saying they are acting within the law. It's just a Gangster set-up - no better <br /><br />Jim Davidson has spelled out exactly what is going on in his recent book.<br /><br />http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SJyzSI40Ol4/U-oGQKORSfI/AAAAAAAAFN4/QLdP3Cfmlp8/s1600/image002.jpg<br /><br />That no media outlet will defend us, the people, against this corrupt authority simply reflects that UK Journalism is as rotten as the CPS and the lawyers who feed off them.Moor Larkinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05275057917684784541noreply@blogger.com