Case for the Defense Day 2 PM session

Even before the shit hit the fan because the film was pulled. The Legal /publicity bods were putting together their response to the shit they foresaw hitting the fan FOLLOWING transmission of a film about a recently deceased National Treasure !

December 7th Helen Deller (publicist) to Rippon, Jones 

They got their shit-storm but not the one they had prepared for !

December 9th 2011 Came the email Jones must have been dreading FROM THE CPS 

 Within the hour Jones asked 

 Their response to 'Meirion' not Mr Jones 

So, that ladies and gentlemen, should have been an end to it (P114)

Liz Mackean contacted her 'victim' (R(2)) still thinking the fake letter could swing things ! (P116)

A letter that did NOT EXIST !

Manufactured by the above who, despite being an obvious LIAR was presented as a 'victim' in the expose made by ITV the following year !

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217352/Jimmy-Savile-scandal-Fake-letter-cast-doubt-victims-claims-played-key-role-BBC-decision.html 

Nine days later 21st Dec (P117)

  
Happy New Year - January 1st 2012 the story was spreading 

 WHO Liz ?

Six days later the Mirror finally gets to write a story about Jimmy Savile and a girls school and other papers soon follow suit !

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bbc-axe-investigation-sir-jimmy-157675

The next event in the Guardian's 'BBC Timeline' takes my interest. 

 Strange but I don't recall Jones mentioning anything about exactly WHO spoke to the Police and what information they had or didn't have that HE DID ! 
His boss was not aware of this either ! (P141/142)

How come Miles Goslett a freelance journalist knew more about Jones' investigations than his boss did ?

Alongside having another victim, Jones miraculously appears to find ANOTHER witness - this woman who, like Fiona the fake letter, will appear on our television screens in Exposure and tell a story that is pure hokum !

The timeline goes quiet from February until late September. And it appears that few of Jimmy's closest friends or even journalists in his home town are aware of the claims, because in June Alison Bellamy's biography is released in a burst of publicity !

Indeed, just a week before 'advance publicity' of the ITV expose is published Jimmy's fantastic headstone is revealed at last in Woodlands Cemetery Scarborough !

Eight days later the guardian announces !

Tomorrow I will be taking a close look at the events of October 2012 But before I finish today I should like to bring your attention to a seemingly unrelated event that took place at the start of that year but NOT listed in the guardian's timeline ! On the same day that the Mirror reported the 'axing' of the Newsnight film, the SAME newspaper reported the fact that a CLAIM had been made against Jimmy Savile's estate by a woman claiming to be his daughter ! Naturally, the estate was then frozen .... it is STILL frozen but not because of Georgina Ray. 



 

Case For the Defense Day two !

We have seen many so-called timelines from the prosecution, here is my attempt to list chronologically, the background to this case as I see it. I refer you all to the Pollard Report, two sections in particular, that of ; Merion Jones' interview with the panel (exhibit 3) and Appendix 12 (exhibit 4) containing various emails from and to various employees of the BBC including its legal department.

 http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/howwework/reports/pdf/pollard/meirion_jones_1.pdf

 http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/howwework/reports/pdf/pollard/appendix_12.pdf

By way of background, the Pollard Report was the result of an extensive investigation into WHY Jones' filmed Savile expose was dropped in December 2011.

From this we can deduce that Jones had seen Savile at his aunt's school. He does not say WHEN, he does not say how OLD he was. Fair enough, it was a long time ago. But, to date, we still DO NOT know for certain WHEN he saw Jimmy despite the fact that such information would be easy to confirm.

Jones tells Pollard that he began formulating his expose in July 2011

We know what Jones was doing in July 2011, it was this !

 The 'paedophiles' they were looking for were not 1970's icons 

  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/9532058.stm

 Now let's get Jones on the stand shall we and ask him this question !

First take a look at exhibit 4 specifically emails dated 25th November to and from Jones. Let's start with the most important one - page 53

 What does Jones mean by 'off the record' and WHY is the 'head of the paedophile unit' going to 'dig out the files' ? Had he formed an association with a senior cop as a result of the July Panorama ? Moreover, why did he need an EX-Cop to do some digging if he already had links to the 'head of the paedophile unit' ?

Despite only have one 'victim', Jones is hell bent on transmission the first week of December 2011.

.

Jones' boss (Peter Rippon) was keen to go ahead with the story but ONLY IF it could be established that the CPS's reason for dropping the case were because he was TOO OLD and NOT because of 'insufficient' evidence. 

Jones' rough script was ready on the 29th November 

 
 Note how Jones is aware of the hoax letter but is happy to use this unsubstantiated evidence P62 App 12

 Bear in mind, that at this time Jones only has ONE witness on camera until he finds THIS ONE 

 
Jones' second 'victim' is actually NOT a 'victim' at all ! Not even an ALLEGED victim. 


Mr Jones when did you first make contact with Rochelle Shepperd your not even alleged, 'victim' ? 


Please refer to exhibit 5 an article that appeared in the Mail on 20th October 2012 which includes an interview with this 'victim' 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220802/Meirion-Jones-BBC-war-astonishing-claims-reporter-aunt-saw-Savile-abuse-school.html

Mr Jones why did you NOT contact your aunt or any of the other staff at Duncroft before you started your 'script' ? His employer's legal team wanted to know about his aunt too in November 2011 (P73)

So, by the END on November 2011 exactly ONE month after the death of SJS we have a bunch of journalists, their bosses and their legal department who are embroiled in a story about one of the biggest and BEST LOVED entertainers ever and NOT one of them has sought any PROOF that any of the claims made have any veracity ! 

Jones' script included reference to a man whose name has since been CLEARED by the Police.

 
 Jones based his expose of my client on a 'web-memoir' written by this witness P12/338 App 12 

Mr Jones exactly WHEN did Mark Williams-Thomas become involved in your project ?

 
 This is what you told Pollard about what you KNEW on 4th November 2011

But Mr Jones, did you or did you not discuss your project with MWT in June or July 2011 ? You wrote this on the 30th November (P80)

But, this is what you told Pollard (see exhibit 3 P4 Meirion Jones interview)

 
Back to 29th November 2011 when it would appear that other media outlets were becoming aware of the story !
P74 Peter Rippon to Legal dept
 

Fast forward to Dec 5th - 7th 2011. Jones says that he doesn't have confirmation from the CPS but, they should GO AHEAD ANYWAY !

 


 His boss is getting very twitchy (P103)

 
 But it is clear that Jones wants to pursue regardless of the fact that he HAS NOT CHECKED THE FACTS. And, is that a threat of things to come should the film NOT be broadcast ? (P107)

 On December 1st Jones wrote an email to himself containing his personal thoughts on the matter ! (P90 - 91)

 Is this evidence that the MSM were already conspiring against the BBC and ready to STITCH up Sir Jimmy Savile even before the Newsnight fiasco came to public attention ? (P93)

 

Mr Jones has a lot of questions to answer but this court will rest now. Next time !

 Rippon pulls transmission when the CPS confirm WHY they did not pursue a case against Savile in 2009 and ALL HELL breaks loose !
 

 


 

Case for the Defense - Day 1

Before anyone is convicted of any criminal crime in this country, he/she has the right to a FAIR TRIAL.

 Read (d) in a court of law, the defendant has the opportunity 'to examine 'witnesses against him' . But even before any of this happens, any accusation made against another should be investigated BY THE POLICE and forwarded to the CPS who then have to do this !

 Of course the above is irrelevant if you are DEAD, or is it ?

In January 2013 the late Jimmy Savile was convicted by the Metropolitan Police of a number of serious offences against women and children despite the FACT that no examination of the allegations made against him had taken place. Here's how Commander Spindler saw things on the day Giving Victims a voice was published !

A few months before Spindler and co had abandoned any investigation into Jimmy. They were more interested in LIVING suspects !

October 28th that's just 23 days after Exposure was aired (Oct 3rd 2012) ! I refer my learned friends to item no 1 a blog post by Moor Larkin who covers the case against LIVING suspects and how it relates to the accused (Savile) here 

http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/illusions.html?view=flipcard

Now, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, let us go back to the evidence upon which this TRIAL IN ABSENTIA arose !

I bring now exhibit 1 for the defense. A blog written by an ex pupil of the school attended by the complainants and published shortly after the so-called expose was aired in 2012 !

 Ms Raccoon attended the school in 1965 so what has this to do with Jimmy Savile allegedly abusing girls in the 70's ? Well, read on and on and on because this is only the start of a very long process of investigation by this blogger and those who followed her lead in the quest for the OTHER SIDE, of the OTHER SIDE of the Jimmy Savile story.

Here's the story that caught Ms Raccoon's eye ! The date has caught mine. Bloody hell, this was published TWO DAY BEFORE exposure was aired !

And here is where our 70's accusers come into the story !

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2211463/Jimmy-Savile-As-pressure-grows-BBC-cover-women-come-forward-ordeals.html
 
Note that the story was 'updated' on 2nd October. Maybe that was because of this !

 http://annaraccoon.com/2012/10/24/past-lives-and-present-misgivings-part-four/

This was NOT the first time ex Duncrofter's had approached the press with their stories about Savile, Ms Raccoon goes on !

And, it would not be the last ! Because, there they were again in 2007, only this time the Police took their stories seriously enough to actually investigate them for TWO YEARS ! 

As in 1994, the complainants did NOT WANT to proceed with their case and so it was dropped as per the CPS CODE that applies to the LIVING. Another law that applies to the living is that of libel and defamation of character because you see, those complainants would have had to SWEAR on oath in a court of law that their evidence is the TRUTH, the whole truth etc etc ! 

However, ladies and gentlemen I digress and I have really no need to because, despite claims to the contrary, the CPS were absolutely right not to proceed against Jimmy with or without the complainants as was their duty to do so if they felt the case to be worthwhile, in the 'public interest'. WHY ? because the complainants are NOT credible witnesses a fact that has been PROVEN in the case against THE LIVING !

 
One commentator reacted to Ms Raccoon's blog post thus 

Ladies and gentlemen, these are my opening remarks for the DEFENSE of the Late Sir Jimmy Savile. It's time for a break now after which I shall set out in DETAIL the factual evidence that NO-ONE including the Police have bothered to evaluate. I shall call witnesses who will PROVE that my client has been the subject of a GROSS act of PERVERSION of the course of Justice by persons KNOWN and, as yet, UNKNOWN !