Outreach : what no one is telling us !

Remember Operation Outreach, the one that investigated claims made by some ex Duncroft women that they had told the staff that Savile was sexually abusing them ? Here's what we were told about this 

 100 pupils questioned, yet NO charges arose out of any of those interviews. I find it strange that upon it's closure no report was ever published into the findings. All we and those 100 + gals got was a letter !

Now, bear in mind, this was NOT about Jimmy's 'offending'. that was something the cops accepted anyway. This was about reports said to have been made to Miss Jones and her staff, at the TIME of the alleged assaults.
Here's one of the first to accuse to implicate the staff, Francis aka Sandra 

Fran wasn't alone, another who claimed to be in D in 1974 is Deborah Cogger, who sold her Savile story to Bella Magazine. She's another whose age varies according to circumstances. Here she is on the Voy forums in August 2012, courtesy of the raccoon blog

In the cash for stories arena she's in D in 1973. She says she'd been there 6 months when Jimmy first visited 

The title of the article is fitting isn't it ? I don't believe her, do you ?

She gives her age as 52 in October 2012, so there's a good chance her birth year is 1960. She then tells us she marries for the SECOND time in 1979. Two marriages by the age of 18/9 ? I think not pet !

http://www.featureworld.co.uk/storysold94-jimmy-savile-victim/#.UH_g_hjlWax
It was Cogger the hacks questioned when it was revealed that Angela Sullivan was going to be involved in outreach ! Sullivan had worked on the 2007/9 investigation and the media were NOT happy. Not happy one bit that someone involved in a proper Police investigation lasting two years that found insufficient evidence to charge, was now involved in the Duncroft investigation.

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261452/Jimmy-Savile-scandal-Fury-detective-blasted-letting-DJ-hook-key-officer.html
We're told that Sullivan is DCS in Ornament. She comes in for a lot of stick including this from another EX Surrey Police constable

 What came of this complaint I wonder. Who made it and WHY  ? Fiona knows Sullivan, from 2007/9. Did she interview her ? The former did say the fake letter was from Sullivan

I wonder how Fiona managed to get the year she was interviewed wrong ? Is 2006 the year she and her pals began plotting Jimmy's downfall ?
To be continued guys and gals !

Charlotte !

Another day another exposer exposed ! Today it's Charlotte's turn. She's the first Duncroft woman he presents. But before she opens her mouth, he says this 
MWT "Savile was invited to the school to help raise it's profile" Er, no he wasn't, he was invited by Susan with the staff's and her mother's approval !
MWT "But soon, his frequent visits became the talk of the common room. Charlotte says she was 14 when she first met Savile there in 1974"
She then talks a load of nonsense about "teenage banter" and "oh here we go again, Jimmy Savile, so the way THEY spoke about it sometimes was like having a cup of tea"
Not to be outdone by her contemporaries, she recounts a tale about a campervan and a recording for a radio show.

 http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xu2i9x_exposure-the-other-side-of-jimmy-saville-couchtripper_news

Her story has been confirmed to be untrue because it implicates staff who've since been exonerated following Operation Outreach !
Now, the beauty of Charlotte's story is that it's been lifted from an event that actually happened. Jimmy DID record some of the girls in his camper van for his Savile's Travels program. BUT, the girls were from Norman Lodge so NONE of them were 14. Charlotte, you're a liar !
I wonder if anyone bothered to search the BBC radio archives for this recording ? Was it broadcast ? Why didn't Thomas use it ? 
Fiona's right in the middle of it again. In an extract from an email, she talks about the filmed interviews with MWT

 They filmed me back in March about 6 weeks ago and Charlotte was filmed on the Friday of the same week.  Mark has sent me emails EDITED   With regard who else will be there, I know that they want to film Carole Allen (Wells), Rochele Conway (Shepherd), Francis and of course Kat.

Carole Wells ? Was she in exposure ? Here's what she told the Telegraph

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9614091/Jimmy-Savile-treated-school-like-paedophile-sweetshop.html

Here's how SWNS describe her 

I haven't spotted her yet ! maybe someone else could help and watch this shit again to see if her story matches anyone else.

By the way, I was wrong about Tracie's sister being on camera in Exposure, an actress played her instead. Not that it matters, she provided the story, the responsiblity is hers ! 

Who's next Guys and Gals ? Watch this space !

Addendum
Just been reminded that Susan recounted the story about the radio show recording in the raccoon blog. Here's her recollection of the event !

Apologies for all these updates guys and gals. But I think you'll agree they are important.
http://annaraccoon.com/2014/05/02/exclusive-the-origins-of-savilisation-part-four/  

Exposer's Exposed !

One 'Miss' from the Levitt report has been bugging me since I found out who she is.
What a bloody WASTE of time any OUR money that report was. Let me explain, here is how Tracie and her sis are described in Levitt. Miss B is the one who came up with the TV room beef biyani nonsense by the way.

Here's the list according to Fiona 
Miss A not at D but reported to Police 2007
Miss B witness of abuse See next
Miss C victim of abuse 1977 Beef Byrani
D Tracie's sister
E Tracie 
F uck know's
G 'me' 

Read her sister's statement to the Police, 'she might know of others' plural ! Strange thing to say when the only other you claim to know is your sister !
Tracie didn't want to speak to Levitt who managed to assume from that the following

Tracie's sister didn't refuse when MWT came a knocking in 2012. She's actually featured on camera as 'Sarah'. Credit for this earlier t bit of detective work to Moor Larkin. 

Try not to LOL at that 'her family know nothing' nonsense.

Here's the 2007/8 version of the alleged 'assault'

Larkins conclusion ?

Nice one mate 
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/exposition-pt8.html

Here's how Fiona describes Tracie or Tracy as she called her on CLR in May 2012.


The only other thing I know is certain people have not been asked to join this other group. I was asked to stand assurance for  (my opinion is she is an adult and has her own views and can make her own decissions) and Sheila  has not been asked as she is friends with a Barnardos girl called Tracy  and it was BLANK who set fire to Queen Anne. Nobody really trusts Tracy..
Now, bear in mind this is a censored extract from a post she made to another ex Duncroft woman. She posted as Susan Melling. Does this woman lie straight in bed ?
Getting back to Tracie and her sis. It does seem strange for them to report such a minor incident as the one they describe don't you think ? Was the sister in touch with the Beef Byrani gals ? Had the three of them conspired to contact the cops in 2007 ? Notice how Thomas never informed his audience of 'Sarah's' link to Duncroft (her sister) again credit to ML. 
I wonder when Tracie first contacted Thomas ? She is certainly a fan of his. Imagine my surprise when I found Tracie on Twitter. She uses her real name so I've censored it, just in case. Now, it could be that this is NOT the same Tracie, but I think she is !
To MWT 12th January 2012

Justice is rarely the outcome if they are famous, to many people willing to cover for them

0 retweets 0 favorites

11:21 AM - 12 Jan 2012

Agree with taking knighthoods away if not deserved, now is it possible to do it posthumously ???????

0 retweets 0 favorites

5:47 AM - 1 Feb 2012

In response she says rather tellingly 

now r they sure that he is not to old to be charged!!!!!!

0 retweets 0 favorites

12:37 PM - 24 Jan 2012

Well well , it's all coming out about Mr Savile now

0 retweets 0 favorites

4:54 AM - 10 Feb 2012

She RT'd this Thomas tweet on 20th Sept 2012

What do you make of this reader ? She sounds like a bitter sort doesn't she ? What's more she's clearly someone who's been in touch with Thomas at the start of his attempt to stitch Jimmy up. Who knows she may be one of Jones' a'R'ses. I don't care because she's just another nasty piece of work, willing to tramp all over Jimmy's grave. And, for that, I despise her and her mates ! 

Addendum 

I've altered my blog slightly because I think I may have got the sisters mixed up. Strangely enough someone purporting to be Tracie's sister. found herself on the raccoon blog, exchanging comments with Sally Stevens. WHY she chose to call herself 'Tracie' ? Who knows ? Judge for yourself. It would be great to hear from either Tracie or her sister, but I'll not hold my breath

http://annaraccoon.com/2012/10/31/past-lives-and-present-misgivings-part-seven/

Bad memories !

Do not good liars make and few make a better example of this truism than Karin Ward. But before I demolish at least one of her lies I'm going to get Bebe Roberts out of the way. I'm not really interested in her save the fact that it was her lies that led other bloggers to dissect ALL the Savile Duncroft tales.

 http://annaraccoon.com/2012/10/24/past-lives-and-present-misgivings-part-four/
She has also formed a friendship with Fiona. Remember her attempts to manipulate Karin Ward with this 
Email FSJ to KW June 2013
It appears that you, me and Bebe have all been publicly attacked. I was accused of forgery, something that was actually done by someone else who I now feel used us.
Bebe is mentioned several times by Fiona in the emails I've seen. I can only assume that the two have formed a bond out of a shared interest, money. 
Now back to Karin, the lynchpin of Meirion Jones' story, and a woman who continually presents herself as a fffff fourteen year old in March 1974. She forgets herself again when she tells Fiona this

Eighteen in 1976 ? That means she had to be 15 going on 16 in 1974 depending on her date of birth. And why is she telling Fiona all her business ? She's already told her that she doesn't remember her at all. She's responding to the nonsense Fi is feeding her including this

You may like to know that I even informed the police that an official document was wrong, concerning you! MJ gave me the ICU register (when I spent Christmas, 1979 with Theo and family in the ICU), Fran said the two of you ran away together and ended up in the ICU and she caught nits from you, so I informed the police, when I gave it to them, that there was a serious omission as neither of your names appeared in it.
Now, Karin may have spent several years of her teens out of her mind but surely she wasn't going to fall for this bullshit.

I have a copy of that photo of you, Fran EDIT Susan and EDIT , because I took it! You should learn that if we as a group are going to get through this, and the many other problems we all have, we need to get together, contact each other and if you want help then allow others to help you. I am not here to judge you as I myself actually ended up in a very serious court case, I was accused of something's that had two mandatory sentences of 10 years inprisonment for each charge. 
That would be this photo would it not ?

 
Francis Jennings has already outed herself claiming victim status at the hands of Savile, so I have no qualms telling you the following. Fran is NOT in this photo, I'm told she actually took the photo. In place of Fran is Toni Townsend another Savile accuser. And then there's 'Susan' who has NOT accused Jimmy of anything. She brought him to the school in 1974 as a friend. Reading thefollowing almost has me feeling sorry for Karin. Fiona's words sound threatening do they not ?

I have not told anyone else that I am aware that you wrote saying you could not remember if Dr Lidell was Male or female? I am certain that many would be interested in the evidence that you wrote much of others memories....not something I have ever told anyone else!
> . I have no idea of the truth but I do know that your little stunt on careleaversreunited actually upset rather a lot of old pupils. We all know it was Susan EDIT's mother who bought Savile to Duncroft. If you met him in Jersey that makes things worse for you because you were the child, but I personally gave you credit for your honesty when others were really angry with your online blog and much else.

Fiona refers to an article/s published in the Mail and remarks made by the headmistress Margaret Jones whose descriptions of her charges, indicatedthey were the hunters as opposed to the hunted.

 
I am certain that you got the same sort of phone calls that I got from Fran. The one telling me that MJ was slagging both you and me off and what she had told the Daily Mail about us actually hurt. I ended up seeing a solicitor, contacting the BBC complaints dept. Speaking not only to the various police who visited my home but also Alison Levitt QC from the DPP. Much much more went on. Mark informed me that your account/version could be taken with a " pinch of salt". He felt hurt as he felt you used him, apparently your boyfriend told him never to contact you again in a very rude manner and yet when you contacted him he came running!
Now the Mail piece titled 'they were no angels' Nov 2012 included stories by some of the other girls in (or taking) that photo. The coven were clearly upset by someone telling the truth for once. It's certainly worth a re read if for no other reason than this 

 
The hackette reporting these words was either not interested in this potentially lucrative aspect of the story, or she was not interested in speaking to anyone who might have a good word to say about Jimmy.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2227086/They-angels-Headmistresss-cruel-dismissal-girls-abused-Jimmy-Savile-claims-told-to.html
Miss Jones knew the sort of girls she was dealing with. 

She sounds like another brave honest lady does she not ? Janet Cope said more or less the same thing. The Police accepted what Miss Jones said, FACT ! No charges were brought against any member of staff and none of the 1974 women's stories regarding living personalities were seen to be credible enough to warrant prosecuting even Gary Glitter on.
But then Gary Glitter was NOT at, that second group outing to the BBC studios was he a fact that could so easily be verified. It seems logical to suppose that the five gals who accompanied a teacher to that Clunk Click episode were the same five involved in Fran's photo. They'd obviously formed a grouping of sorts. The others were NOT friends of Susan, they merely used her as a way to get to Savile and his gifts of fags and sweets. 
More importantly, I'd suggest that it wasn't only fags, sweets and trips to London that they wanted. At least two of them were attracted to Jimmy. They were jealous of Susan so much so that she ended up having to be segregated from the others for her own protection. 
I'll continue this aspect of the story next time when I take a closer look at this angelic looking demon ! 

 In the meantime, ask yourself this : Why have these women been presented as separate entities when the press must know full well that they are known to each other, some even sharing the same dorm. Would Jimmy Savile have been stupid enough to get involved with a bunch of emotionally damaged and manipulating school girls. Of course he wouldn't ! 
Next time ! 


 
 

 

Open letter to Osborne Clark Solicitors !

In the last hour I have sent the following email to OC Solicitors who act for executors of Sir Jimmy Savile's estate. We've been in contact before, I had offered my services as a researcher for the scrutiny of the compensation claims. I was turned down on the basis that I'd never met or worked with Jimmy, so I blogged this hoping to reach others who had, not that it was going to make much difference given what we know now about the impossibility of the task of any scrutineer !
 http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/scru-tiny.html
 Soon, my concerns were shared by a respected journalist in the main-stream media. David Rose mentions Bebe Roberts in this  article, a lady whose story will form part of my NEXT post. He's written three such articles in relation to alleged, fraudulent compensation claims. This was the first
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2798457/how-savile-s-niece-s-demand-compensation-led-police-fraud-probe-daughter-says-story-false-211-claims-vast-payments-police-investigate.html

I believe the High Court has to agree payment of any compensation claims. This is likely to take place in the next few months I think. I ask you, Osborne Clark and Nat West Bank, is this the way you protect the interests of an estate that was put in your hands, in good faith ?
As you read my recent blog posts, you will see that one of the stories has been challenged and legal proceedings are in place against Karin Ward. The man she accused is in a position to defend himself, Jimmy is not. So far, you have agreed to the payment of compensation, your fees, along with the likes of Slater Gordon, taking pride of place in the, who gets what, when and from whom. Isn't it time you and Nat West started considering tainted evidence ? Is it not the case that, evidence founded on lies is tainted ? 

Thank you !

FFFFFFF Fourteen Fourteen

Remember that Paul Hardcastle song, Nineteen ? I do, it popped into my head after listening to Wards filmed interview with MWT. Just replace the word nineteen with fourteen. I think you'll get the picture !

Then, listen again to Ward and Thomas. ITV have provided three videos for us. Video two might be an edited version of video one. But, she get's to the point as she's obviously been coached to do by the Exposure team. NOTE, Thomas' emphasis on Newsnight. Ward's anger with the BBC is exploited to the full when Thomas asks; 'Tell me specifically the details you gave to Newsnight ?'
KW 'JS had a girl on his lap ... and she came from Duncroft and she was FOURTEEN, we were good friends ... the girl (with Glitter) also came from D. I think she might have been, not quite FOURTEEN'

14, 14. 14, 14,14 !! Sorry, but who the hell does this woman think she is kidding ? From my research, it would appear that MOST D admissions were 15 or very near that age. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong !
http://www.itv.com/news/2012-10-03/gary-glitter-accused-in-new-jimmy-savile-allegations/
The age FOURTEEN has certain legal implications pertaining to sexual offences alleged to have been commited at the time. Read Levitt's summation of Fiona's case and, more importantly, her age at the time of the alleged abuse !

 
Cross reference with the Operation Ornament report 

 Now, let's get back to Fiona's attempts to tempt Ward back into the fold in the summer of 2013. But, firstly let's be clear about HOW she managed to contact so many of Ward's pals in the first place. In a message to another ex Duncroft woman, Sally Stevens, Susan Melling (Fiona) says this

See what she's doing guys and gals ? Her messages to Karin show another face altogether. She goes as far as to say she was in the 1974 photo of the girls, staff and Jimmy outside the education block !

 She attempts to guide her to a new 'secure' site for ex 1970's gals

She even tells her she, herself is dying !

Karin's response 

Fiona's attempt to reel Ward in failed. But, she still had others she'd contacted with the help of that database. What a goldmine Fiona turned out to be for MWT. Best keep her sweet eh Mark ?

http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/a-few-brave-women.html
That's enough from me for now. Time for a break to listen to some music ! Nineteen, nineteen ... Fourteen 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3LdMAqUMnM