HEY, wanna know how to do a REAL investigation ?

What happens when you pay blackmailer's ? They come back for more, that's what ! It appears more 'victims' have come forward to claim Jimmy assaulted them whilst in the care of Hull and East Yorkshire Hospital Trust (HEY for short) 
So what ? I hear you ask, and you'd be spot on. BUT, had I not seen the mirror article, I would not have read the original report. Read on ...

Too late for a claim via the 'scheme'. But it's never too late to sue the NHS is it guys and gals ? 
We don't know what this 'new investigation' relates to, and neither do the press by the look of it

It seems some NHS employees just cannot resist wasting our money and their time, because Lampard's report already covered this establishment !
Let's take a look at the work of those who reported the findings of their investigation in June 2014. I suggest you read this guys and gals. My hat is well and truly raised to Stephen Jessop and his team. Now, this is how you do a proper investigation.
 http://www.hey.nhs.uk/Savile%20Investigation%20Report%20De%20La%20Pole%20Hospital%20Report%20Jun-14.pdf
Here's what happened. 

NOW, read the final sentence of this paragraph and know we are dealing with a smart team of investigators here !

We're talking about ONE allegation here by one nurse relating to ONE patient. This informant is clearly lying and the team know this

Nobody contacted the anonymous telephone line set up after the allegation was made, so the team went in search of the alleged 'victim'. YES, they actually did some work here

 

The alleged 'victim' was tracked down and interviewed and confirmed that she had NOT been assaulted by Jimmy during this one visit to her ward. In fact, she was actually disappointed that he only said a few words to her as she lay there, in traction.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/new-inquiry-launched-more-jimmy-5664920
Back to the team who concluded 

 
 People do lie don't they guys and gals. But lies require a good memory, something N1 didn't possess

So, what's with these 'new' allegations ? I guess we'll find out in good time. In the meantime, lets relish one member of the public's response to the publication of Mr Jessop's report last year. 
http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/Jimmy-Savile-La-Pole-sex-abuse-proven-8211-report/story-21294967-detail/story.html 

 
 

Duncroft Manor TW18 4XX

Amazing what you can find on the internet isn't it guys and gals ? Now, have you ever wondered what the inside of Duncroft School looked like ? I have, and here it is ! Well, sort of because the properties ( main house outbuildings inc Norman Lodge have been converted to flats. Nice to browse through these pages though, see if you can spot the TV room, dining room etc eh ?

FLAT 5 

FLAT 12

 And, this one's currently for sale if you have a spare half million GDP 

Now, how about a drive out and about ? Click on the link below then go to Street view.
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-48345472.html

I always get lost in new places, so I've made it very easy for you. Take a LEFT on Vicarage Road as if your back is to the building and the gates behind you.

At the junction ahead take another LEFT

Now, you'll be taking the first LEFT here

Just after that car where that house is this guys and gals, Moor Laine

 Of course, Moor Lane might continue if you turn RIGHT instead of LEFT, but my drive out has come to an end. Get yourself in your car or on your bike yourself. Who knows what you might find !

Happy motoring !

 http://rockphiles.typepad.com/a_life_in_the_day/2012/11/duncroft-jimmy-savile-and-i-part-two.html

Addendum 8th May 2015
In lieu of Sally's comment, I went back to the property site which provides the following information regarding  the property currently for sale. It clearly states, flat in end terraced cottage, NOT in the manor itself. Here's what the estate agent says about the development of the manor and it's outbuildings in 1996. Naturally, in the refurbishment, many things will have altered, BUT, the manor itself is a listed building and being so the outside cannot be altered or the windows changed.
Make up your own minds guys and gals, I just wanted to show you some photos taken inside the property in recent years. It might be the closest we get to seeing inside unless someone has any old photo's that is !

 

£170,000 worth of LIES !

I'm obliged to one of my regular commentators, Misa for posting this link to this article

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/feb/26/itv-jimmy-savile-sex-scandal-documentary
I'm also grateful to 'Anonymous' and 'Geoff' for pushing the question about how much Exposure cost etc
 http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/exposing-himself-to-more-ridicule.html
Some things are more important than money are they not guys and gals ? We learn a lot about the program making and, more importantly, the concerns ITV had about transmission. They were not alone !

And then, the LIE !

My source tells me otherwise. She doesn't recall being asked for any evidence to 'substantiate' her timeline at Duncroft. The makers obviously didn't ask Fiona either (read my recent blogs). It's all bullshit isn't it guys and gals ? 
As for being paid for their stories, my source tells me she was NOT offered any financial reward,she did get door to door taxi service laid on by Lesley Gardiner !
My source wanted to tell the truth about what she did and didn't see at Duncroft whilst she was there. And she WAS there wasn't she ? Her piece to camera never made it into the program. Her testimony was NOT what Thomas et al wanted to hear. Far better to give oxygen to this convicted fraudster instead 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilfred_De%27ath
Anyway, back to more important players in this flight of fiction. Karin Ward's interview couldn't be broadcast for legal reasons. She may NOT have received payment for her tales. She didn't need to, she had a book awaiting publication after transmission. No wonder she was angry ! The BBC picked up on her and her pals possible motivations for taking part in what was to be, Meirion Jones' baby, Newsnight. Thanks to Liz Gibbons testimony to Nick Pollard 

http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/taste-trumps-haste-every-time-meirion.html
In the Guardian on 9th December 2012, Karin Ward is 'not angry with Jimmy Savile now'. She's described as being, a 54 year old mother of seven. She's also described as being in Exposure !

 http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/dec/09/karin-ward-newsnight-jimmy-savile

Ms Ward was certainly 'angry' a few months before when she focuses her attention on Freddie Starr 

Karin makes a big mistake in this piece, she changes her age from 14 to 15 the night she attended Cluck Click

I mean, she is described as ffffff 14 in other press articles

 

But, getting back to that 'motivation' Liz Gibbons became aware of 'subsequently'

Money guys and gals, money ! As for Fiona, my guess is she's a sad lady who seeks attention. Attention, MWT made sure she got when he got her into that brave woman awards thing.
As fir ITV, it got the story of a lifetime. A story that will come back to haunt them. Up there with World in Action, give me a break !

 

Exposing himself to more ridicule !

MWT who was an officer in Surrey Police for 12 years, according to him, has updated his updated Exposure program to the tune of about 5 minutes. He has an 'exclusive' you see, in that he has had a rather short telephone conversation with Margaret Jones the ex headmistress of Duncroft School, the subject of Operation Outreach by his old police force.

Thankfully, I was able to scroll along this nonsense and get to the point straight away. I've transcribed the conversation for you but you can hear it yourself here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwaT-mfqJpo&feature=youtu.be
He's having a go at his ex-Police force who conducted an investigation into Jimmy in 2007 as a result of claims made by two women who, allegedly resided at Duncroft in the late 1970's.
MWT : Officers decided not to interview any D staff because Barnado's had told them they had no record of any sexual abuse, nor has any former residents or staff witnessed, or aware of any incidents' Apologies, if I've misheard that last bit, he's not very clear is he ?
MWT : But should they at least have spoken to the school's headmistress, Margaret Jones ?

49.52 mins
Hello
Hello Margaret, it's Mark here.

She told me she'd have been very keen to help !

MWT : You weren't spoken to by Surrey Police ?
MJ : I was gob-smacked. I never have been spoken to.
MWT : You've never been spoken to at all ?
MJ : I should have been told he'd been interviewed 

MWT comments 'Jones who is now 90 claims she did not witness any abuse by Savile, nor did she have any suspicions . But (note these are Thomas' words) had Surrey Police have spoken to her they might have learnt crucial information about Savile's visits.

MWT : Did he take any of the girls out in his car ?
MJ : I'm not going to say anything
MWT : You're not going to say anything ?
MJ : I didn't see anything wrong  
MJ : Anyway, must go now thank you ! 

Now, you might come to the same conclusion as Mark. Maybe the cops should have spoken to Miss Jones in 2007/9. The 'crucial information' she would have given would no doubt be the same as the 'crucial information' she continues to give. Maybe then those two women would have been charged with wasting Police time and spreading malicious falsehoods. 

Thomas' stupidity knows no bounds. After all, he didn't speak to Margaret Jones before destroying Jimmy Savile's name. Had he done so, she could have confirmed that Fiona and her recently acquired, pals were lying not onle about their experiences at the school, but WHEN they were even there ! 
But then, Thomas wouldn't have had a television show then and I wouldn't be spending my life doing this !

Happy Holidays guys and gals !

BTW, I wonder WHEN this conversation took place ? Anyone catch that number plate ? 

 

1971

I wondered how Meirion Jones might react to the contents of outreach. My friends on twitter alerted me to the fact that he was NOT happy, not happy at all ! So much so that he has now dug a very big hole for himself by claiming that, contrary to all the evidence, he can place Jimmy at Duncroft in 1971 ! 

 Note, the use of the word 'we' ! Who knows what he means, who cares ? The point is, he now has to produce this 'pic' because if he doesn't he's a liar pure and simple.
Last month, Jones like his witless, shitless, witnesses, was not sure whether it was 1970 or 1971.

Meanwhile, his £500 mate was adding to his ever expanding CV as someone who can put the dead on trial, a 'full trial' at that . I'm NOT making this up.

Need I go on ? Now guys and gals, I thought I'd end the week on a light note. These two idiots will get the justice they deserve, regardless who their mates are !

 Any compo claims from 1970/1971 perchance ?
Jones didn't ask his aunt anything about Jimmy's visits to Duncroft. I'm sure she or the other 'suspect' he left at the mercy of the Savile Police will have something to say about this 'pic' in the unlikely event he decides to produce it ! 

 Freedom come freedom go, tells me yes and then she tells me no. Freedom never stays long, freedom moving along'
Love that song ! Happy May day folks !

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR699ItcMjU