Seems like the press had a more or less, constant interest in how Jimmy Savile spent his days, and it wasn't just the tabloids, oh no, the above article appeared in The Sunday Times July 16th 1978 ! I purchased this a few years ago, and having dragged it out of my stash, re-read it and goodness gracious what a gem it is. To those who want the truth that is, and you won't find much of that in dame dimwit's baloney. Now, read Mr Gales article, I really cannot begin to explain how important it is in terms of SEVERAL of the founding stories in the case against Jim. First off, there's his London pad
OK, we know Jim had a kip in Park Crescent, a mile from Broadcasting House, fine !
He didn't say long at the hi-powered do, he presents his cheque and away he goes.
Off to BBC TVC in Shepherds Bush to record Top of the Pops. The dame's crew could have at least read this
Spot the venue for his late night feast guys and gals ? Why if it isn't the old Lotus House on Edgware Road, the name De'ath used in his Exposure pitch in October 2012.
The above photo is said to be the 'Mascot Hotel' circa 1960 ish I guess. I still don't know if a place of this name actually existed, I can only find an Ascot Hotel in Mayfair which is very close to the Radio Luxemberg studios, I know because I've been there.
At least we KNOW that the Lotus Garden did indeed exist in the 1960's thanks to a telegraph article 2006. We even know who ran it and what cigars he enjoyed
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3622178/Spare-ribs-egg-foo-yung-chop-suey-and-plenty-of-fried-rice-how-to-murder-a-Chinese.html
There's a Chinese by the same name on Edgware Road to this day, could this be the same place ?
'Days before the recording, Savile, then in his late thirties asked to meet him in a Chinese restaurant in Central London' (MWT voice-over Exposure October 3rd 2012).
Is part of De'aths story starting to make sense ? Remember, the show he'd asked Jimmy to appear in was made in 1965, when Jimmy was still working at Radio Luxumberg ? After all, the best lies generally have an element of truth in them, maybe he did meet Jimmy in London, but how much of his 2012 tale can we reasonably accept, especially that bit about meeting the 12 year old with Savile on a Friday night in London (he thinks ?). He says Savile told him he'd met the 12, 13, 14 year old girl at Top of the Pops, the night before.
'I think it was a a Thursday night, Top of the Pops went out on a Thursday night ... I would ring him next morning at the Mascot hotel'
Which makes no sense when you know that De'ath was based in Manchester, his show was to be made in Manchester and best of all, Top of the Pops itself, was being made in Manchester too. Why didn't he just catch Jimmy in Manchester ?
Anyways, back to someone who knows exactly where he was in 1978, when TOTP was recorded, what time it generally ended and what tended to happen afterwards !
Did dame expensive waste of space, Smith not bother speaking to all those other folk that were in and out of the star's dressing rooms while Jimmy was there ? How many technical hitches did they have back then ? Another piece of the jigsaw no-one's bothered to look for. Thank God we have the sort of evidence that would squash these claims long before they were even considered part of a criminal investigation.
Mr Thomas's crew did some research didn't they ? Problem for him being that his researcher's were no doubt only paid for a few hours/days. Me ? I'm not paid by anyone, I do it because I care about Jimmy and all the other poor dead souls being stitched by these horrible people ! As for the dame, don't make me laugh
Shortly after Exposure aired, the press were pressing the cops about so-called missed chances to bring Savile to Justice ! Here's the scum's offering
This article is actually very interesting for what it reveals, not so much about Savile but about what Commander Peter Spindler appeared to be UNAWARE of a few weeks earlier. You see, Pete was hoping for a 'swift' conclusion at his end. There would be NO police investigation, just an assessment, whatever that meant, I still don't know.
OK, let's explain - on 9th October 2012 the cops decided they'd better get involved in the Savile story. Had they missed something themselves, could old Jim have been caught years before ? Well, not according to Pete, because THEY have NO RECORDS of any previous complaints except the one everyone by this time already knew about (2007-9)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19887019
Spindler left his gig at Scotland Yard some time after all this started. You have to wonder if he was pushed, let's face it, he or his researcher's must have been pretty dense not to know that several other Police reports existed prior to this ONE ! Sure enough, a few weeks later he was forced to concede the existence of other Police investigations as far back as the 80's
Hold onto that 2003 claim, I'll come back to that later ! The telegraph article continues
And so the Savile Gestapo was born/created
Strange how little Pete knew about Sir Jimmy Savile a whole 10 days after the story fully broke in the press. Everyone and his wife were, by 30th September 2012, aware that their national treasure might not be one after all ! Abusing underage girls ? surely the PR section at the Yard should have been better prepared than this ? Surely, they could have at least had a look for all those Police reports filed back then ? IF THEY EXISTED THAT IS !
First, I'm gonna cover the easiest one; the so-called 2003 Met Report I kid you not !
This gets a mention in Giving the Savile Gestapo informants a voice in January 2013
And expanded upon two months later in the we'd better correct the mistakes we made earlier, report
OK, that's the assessment out of the way, so what happened next guys ? Where's this 'mps registry' does it even exist ?
Has your head exploded yet ? These muppets have been hundreds of hours overtime just to present this drivel as an official report ! Give me a break
Yeah right, the 2007 cops didn't know about the 2003 claim & the 2003 people didn't know about the 1998 letter or the 1980's claim. And NONE of them most certainly, would have been aware of the 1964 ledger also known as the staff holiday book. A piece of evidence first produced courtesy on ITV news the day the mistakes report appeared, Mmmm, as they say
http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/case-for-defense-day-17.html
Meanwhile, going back to that 2003 Met Report - this incident said to have happened during an episode of Top of the Pops in 1973 ? Sounds awful familiar doesn't it ? My point being, WHO, if anyone, is making this shit up ? You see Sylvia Edwards did NOT make her claim until November 2012
And she certainly hadn't filed a police report
Of course the 2003 claim is one of those seven chances the cops missed, according to the sun in an article published days before Sylvia arrived on the scene (26th October 2012)
I assume they got this bit from the mirror ??
The sun have rather craftily, juxtaposed the official line from information they have received via sources they refer to as 'cops'. These appear to be ex-cops at that ! Read it yourself, it's one of the few scum articles that's actually worth reading !
It's always the sun isn't it ?
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4610347/police-missed-seven-chances-to-catch-Jimmy-Savile.html
Wonder if they've found them police reports yet ? Maybe they're lost, like the Savile diaries, difference being, at least we KNOW Jimmy's diaries existed !
Goodness Gracious, you go looking for an acorn and you find a bloody oak tree ! Earlier today I published a post exposing just ONE of the lies that made the front pages of the gutter & below gutter level press on 12th January 2013. Whilst sifting through those half dozen or so papers, I came across a copy of a daily mirror I'd acquired as part of my research, dated April 27th 2002. Now, one of the reasons this article caught my eye was the fact that it's intention to promote a special weekend of Louis Theroux programmes on UK Horizons.
Here's just a few extracts of what Ms Smith managed to get out of Jimmy during her visit to him, covering the usual topics.
She's also interested in his feelings about Louis
'a sad experience' ?
Poor Jim, he made an effort to made this humorless woman laugh, she didn't !
Now guys and gals, let me assume the position of a defence brief for the next few minutes or so. You see 'we now Know' something none of us UK Horizon viewer's obviously did in May 2002. Something that the boys at Trinity mirror obviously didn't know, and neither did Jimmy, but Louis Theroux did ! The next bit comes courtesy of Moor Larkin's blog
The strange thing about this for me anyway is WHY these women bothered to write to Theroux in the first place ? They don't want to make a police complaint, they're just annoyed that Savile lies about not having girlfriends !! Doesn't make sense does it ? And, if it doesn't make sense !!
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/louis-gals-stories.html
But so what ? What's all the fuss about ? Louis didn't think Savile was a paedophile probably because, up until the arrival of the Savile Gestapo, no one had taken ANY of the rumours about him seriously. Not even the Police, the real police that is, and the real CPS real as in officers who investigated claims as they came in. NOT claims that have been PLANTED after the fact, like the one from 1964. Oh and the one from 2003, but I'll tell you more about them next time. The plot thickens guys and gals, the plots thicken !
The Press can print any old lies it likes now, same as it ever was, as David Byrne (Talking Heads) used to say ! I really don't have enough life-times to blog ALL the subsequently established LIES these scum-bags have published about Sir Jimmy, but I can give you ONE today
Above is just one of the DOZENS of front pages printed the day after the first Savile reports were published. I said three Hail Mary's after rushing out to buy ALL the papers I could see on Saturday 12th January 2013. For some reason this morning I forgot to include the scum when I photo'd ALL my papers
'Savile abused a dying child, 11 at Great Ormonde Street' said the rag that fortified the Hillsborough LIES for more than a quarter of a century ! Anyways, that front page just happens to be a God-send as it happens guys and gals ! WHY ? because in June 2014 the NHS report makers established that that particular claim about a 'DYING CHILD' was rubbish !
Short and sweet guys and gals - I'll have more examples of how the MSM have been GROOMING us all for the last FOUR YEARS !
©
Goodness gracious guys and gals, do you realise that Radio 1 will be 50 years old next year ? Do you care ? I don't except that it sounds good, unlike the rubbish that is Radio 1 in 2016. Here's one year that Radio 1 still sounded pretty good to me & millions of other youngsters. Ten years after it began and the country loved it's disc jockeys back then !
Blimey, guys and gals, spot the DJ who hasn't been implicated in Yewtree. I can count seven who've either been : arrested, sacked or posthumously denounced by the Savile police etc.
The Radio Times I have used for my post is dated 1-7th October 1977, bang in the middle of Sir Jimmy Savile's 'crime' spree or thereabouts, and here we have almost the whole of this publication celebrating these seven blokes. Six years after Claire M's tragic death and four years after Rodney Collins's was asked by Derek Chinnery to ask his pals in Fleet Street whether they had any dirt on Savile ? - they hadn't ! Nevertheless, here he is, right there at the front and a nice big article about him inside.
First though, have a look back at happier times for DLT, Tony Blackburn, Cliff Richard and so on
Dave Lee Travis and Hot Chocolate
Alan Fluff Freeman and Genesis
Kid Jenson
And the Radio One Roadshow including the legendary 'Smiley Miley' and his guess the mileage competition ! Happy days
I allowed myself a wry smile at the inclusion in the magazine of another Yewtree bit player : Wilfred D'eath, yes really he has a column all to himself, he's not a producer now he's a writer of sorts reviewing the comings and goings at Radio 4, which would have been of no bloody interest to my sixteen year old self !
Then there's Jim, who has lots to say about his radio show - speakeasy, you might find his words interesting !
A new series of Speakeasy folks ! And it's on the radio at 2pm on Sunday, just after his double top ten show ! He describes having no real interest in politics, save thinking Maggie Thatcher is a 'particularly attractive lady' and that communism will never take on !
Goodness gracious, Savile was giving people a voice before that idea became a slogan rather than a service ! I'd sure like to read or hear the speakeasy on 'gossip columnists'
Then there's the psychology of the 'punters' who tune in to listen to those voices !
There's that mention of blindness again ! Be interesting to know just WHEN that show went out ! Someone find out if you can, I cannot go there again !
Two years before the RT celebrated Radio 1's ten year milestone, it published a fantastic, in-depth article about Savile who is by this time (May 1975) a huge TV and Radio star. The press couldn't get enough of him. They were in his houses, at his hospitals and there were no questions that were off limits !
I wonder if the dame spoke to the same folks Anthony-Haden Guest met as he 'followed him on his other multifarious weekly activities' Bet you haven't heard this Broadmoor 'voice' before ?
Unless you've seen this in an earlier post !
So, what's my point about 50 years of Radio 1 ? What's that got to do with Justice For Jimmy ? My point is, and always will be, that Jimmy Savile was in the public eye for more than half a century and not once was he arrested for ANY offence let alone the 214 the corrupt yewtree cops have appended to his dead body ! I hadn't previously read that snipe at 'gossip-columnists' until today ! You see, these 'trolls' did exist back in 1977 they haven't suddenly arrived via social media and twitter and, punters always like a bit of gossip, don't they ?
I'll be re-reading more of my Savile library (it's quite extensive you know and cost me a small fortune), but it was worth it. You see, you can put any old shit in any old rag or in anyone's mouth if the price is right. But you cannot alter the FACTS, and the FACT is that Jimmy Savile was loved and trusted by us 'punters' and that was enough for him, sod the gossips. It's enough for me too !
29th May 1975
