Court of Appeal Decision

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/national-westminster-bank-plc-v-lucas-others/
It will take me some time to read through and understand the 43 page Judgement. One paragraph that caught my eye for obvious reasons follows Point 71 Page 28/43

 I needed to check that I had not done Ms Dux a disservice earlier and I am satisfied that, whilst the Judgement indicates the Judge's assumption that a 'significant number .. genuine and well founded'  they did not say that these claims would be 'successful' 
On a happier note, it would appear that part of the Trust's Appeal was successful !

They didn't get it all their own way ! To be continued !
 http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/jimmy-savile-estate-to-cover-legal-fees-of-victims-30840773.html

Addendum 16th December 21.21 pm GMT

It appears that I was wrong and Ms Dux was right in her reportage of what the Judge had said at the appeal hearing. I will blog more on this tomorrow ! Apologies for any misunderstanding !

The Appeal Judgemant - according to Liz Dux

The Savile High Court Appeal Judgement has NOT been published yet so I cannot tell you what the Judges actually decided. I can however, tell you what the Press Association and Liz Dux had to say today at 10.am GMT. I knew she would be making an announcement live from the court via the BBC because she tweeted this

Just after 10am the Mail published this

 Notice that particular paragraph

I guess we'll have to wait for the full judgement in order to be quite sure whether or not the Court 'held' any such opinion. I am reliably informed by someone who was there, that the claims themselves were NOT DISCUSSED at all !
 http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/the-appeal-what-no-one-is-telling-you.html

Whatever ! The Mail was the first to break Ms Dux' story at 10.02. Here's what the others are reporting

 The Guardian acquired an expanded version of Dux' version of : what the Judges said

 That's interesting ! The claims will be 'scrutinised independently by a judge ... '
 http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/dec/16/jimmy-savile-appeal-court-compensation-scheme
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30494996
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-2875595/Ruling-Savile-compensation.html
Watch this space Guys and Gals ! The schemer's 'scheme' may have got the 'go ahead' but the individual claims still have to stand up to scrutiny. But, whatever, whoever says, I will go on with my quest for JUSTICE FOR JIMMY, because, for some of us at least, it is really NOT ABOUT THE MONEY !

 

The PEOPLE'S Tribunal !

Right, I'm going to get this one out of the way, straight away ! Please don't be alarmed, I'm sure what John Cooper QC has in mind is nothing like this !

 The above is a photo from the trials that followed the plot to kill Hitler in 1944. These were presided over by the infamous Judge Roland Freisler whose sole reason for being born must have been the show trials wherein he belittled and humiliated men and women of honour and conviction ! 
 http://www.executedtoday.com/tag/plot-to-kill-hitler/
And here is this disgusting man in action !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXwiZM74n_Q 
 
As I said, I'm sure that Cooper's People's Tribunal will be nothing like the above. I'm sure no-one will be humiliated and voices will not be raised. BUT, will those who are summoned to appear before this 'tribunal', be granted the right to a defense ? It's not clear from the web site information ! Worse still, the Police will only be involved if necessary AFTERWARDS 

This People's Tribunal has failed before it has started. It proclaims itself independent but it is not !

 http://linkis.com/org.uk/tjl4i
At the bottom of that page a reference is made to a film maker. I have no idea if these hearings are to be televised, but I think we should be told !

I'm sure John Cooper QC is an honourable man unlike Hitler's judge and President of 'the People's Court' in Nazi Germany. But questions have been raised as to his role which is described as 'chief prosecutor'

 
No-one rejoices in any man's death in normal circumstances, but some men we are better rid of. Call it karma if you will !

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Freisler
 

Twenty Five years !

For Ray Teret

You can download the full pdf document here. It's not very big but my eyes were drawn to a few of the paragraphs
 http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/r-v-ray-teret/

And then there's this ! The judge cites 35 counts now ?

That's not was reported in the press 

Last night ITV broadcast a very good dramatised account of the media's disgusting treatment of an innocent man whose only link to a murder was the fact he was the victim's landlord. That and the fact he is an eccentric, a personality trait that is now illegal in the UK, made him an easy target for the press and cops alike. 

When will we ever learn ?

Another Brick in the Wall !

Remember this Guys and Gals ?

 I do and I remember how we all laughed out loud at this ridiculous story. There was, NO LINK to Savile at the time and there still isn't. But, this wall appears to have re-appeared in the case against Jimmy's acquaintance, Ray Teret !

We know it's the same wall (bear with me on this one guys) by comparing the two stories. The wall or should I say it, the names allegedly scrawled on it, was discovered in July 2013 and reported on Sunday 28th July 2013. 
The Mail's reportage at the time was more restrained than the Mirror's whose hacks turned it into a gory story about Savile despite the cops statements at the time 

But, one thing BOTH versions of the story had in common was a link to this guy !

 Birmingham University Prof and Mark's tutor offered his opinion at the time

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2380298/Operation-Yewtree-Roll-victims-secret-wall-amid-Jimmy-Savile-inquiry.html
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/jimmy-savile-celeb-arrests-could-2097740
I decided to don my best burrowing apparel again and burrow a bit further. Here's what MWT was tweeting on or around Sunday 28th July 2013. 

Nowhere in the MSM was Ray Teret's name mentioned at the time. But the ickies thought they were onto something 

'Lots going on in GMP' What does he mean by this ? As for that reference to the 'Savile expose' is this what he meant ? Had Teret's accuser's led GMP to this wall or ... ?

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/names-terets-victims-found-scrawled-8235769
The above article was published the day Teret was found GUILTY. By October 2013 the charges against him had increased significantly from the three he was originally charged with ! 8th Nov 2012

October 2013

At least 3 complainants refer to a RECORD shop in their testimony's. I only have the first 3 days of Live reportage, but I wanted to check if any of these might link to the Savile claim. They don't !

 

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/live-updates-former-dj-ray-7900854
Later on the same day of the trial (Day2) we hear part of Teret's Police statement 

Day 3 pm we hear from the Savile accuser who claims to have met Teret not at a record shop but a club

 
And, the flat at which she claims to have been taken to where she was allegedly raped by BOTH men was part of a house 

Here are a few of the tweets live from the court on Nov 5th 2014 the day Teret takes the stand

And here we have more in-depth coverage of the days events. Note, that at no time are we told that Teret is Savile's flat-mate or driver for that matter !

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2822237/Former-Radio-Caroline-DJ-accused-raping-girl-15-Jimmy-Savile-previous-underage-sex-conviction-jury-told.html
Just to repeat, I have NOT seen all the witness testimony from the trial and I'm not sure how the press know either. BUT the Manchester Evening News says that the names of two complainants are on that 'secret wall' uncovered last year ! But, this is the closest we get to it !

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/names-terets-victims-found-scrawled-8235769
 

All in all, it's justa - nuther brick in their wall !