A few years ago when I started my wee Justice For Jimmy campaign, I determined to wind up the media powers-that-be, by launching a day by day countdown to an, open to anyone, event in Roundhay Park, Leeds. When I say wind up, I mean that while the event was for real, I wanted to do something to piss the Savile schemer's off. They got the message and I got the back-lash and what fun I had ! It was a twitter based affair because I didn't have a blog back then but I did co-write this wee number advertising the get together and explaining what me and a few others were doing and WHY !
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/time-to-walk-talk.html
For the purpose of any new readers or Savile sceptics, I will repeat my own personal reasons for starting 'Justice For Jimmy', and I'll begin with a picture from a Radio Times article that tore at my heart-strings the first time I saw it !
And, as if those smiling faces weren't enough ! Here's how they found themselves part of a hugely popular Saturday night television show, one that brought happiness to millions
It's August bank holiday 1980 and here's what Jimmy did for these disabled kids !
c
I've just started another countdown on twitter as it happens guys and gals ! You see, one very public face of the posthumous cowardly and corrupt attack on Sir Jimmy is in trouble ! Slater and Gordon solicitors are on the brink of collapse and they have less than three weeks to pull themselves out of it !
I doubt Jimmy would have said a bad word about anyone, but he most definitely would have subscribed to the principle - Do unto others as they would do unto you ! Slater and Gordon along with a great many others have blighted their copybook and I like to think that Karma is catching up with them at last.
Am I being vindictive ? You bet I am especially when I came across this latest quote from the truly horrible Ms Dux published in the equally despicable daily mirror, about some rubbish program to be aired tomorrow night which includes an assertion that Savile 'MAY HAVE' had the snip (vasectomy) in order to avoid impregnating his 'victims' !
I hope Slater Gordon do go bust because I like to see folk get what they deserve. Like that geezer who was paid just a few grand for his tales about Jimmy, whilst Liz's crew pocketed FIVE times as much as he did. How I laughed out loud at that one.
And the best is yet to come pals, and while we wait for Madam Karma to arrive at a few more doors, let's enjoy my countdown to, hopefully closure day for Slater & Gordon. Whether they fold or not who cares ? But let's enjoy the idea just the same.
Hello guys and gals, back to business. Now then, here's a thing, whilst I was off-piste, my head in a different place, I received this little ditty from someone calling themselves 'Rochelle Shepherd'
Posted on a blog a year before
http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/karin-fiona-and-rochelle.html
She 'did go to Duncroft' then, funny, why didn't she mention this in her interview with Meirion in 2011. Let me remind y'all (and myself because I did have to do some back-tracking) that RS was that controversial second 'victim' interviewed on camera. Remember, Mei was getting quite desperate trying to find a second 'victim' to go on camera, until Fiona suggested R3 (Rochelle)
Fiona was camera shy back then or maybe she was a bit smarter than we give her credit for. She knew she had not been abused by Jimmy Savile, but she sure as hell wasn't going to go on TV 2 weeks after his death and say otherwise. Oh no because, what Fiona was to MWT, Karin and Rochelle were to Meirion Jones. Rochelle never appeared on the ITV expose, her appearance came a few weeks later in Panorama.
I wasn't the only one wondering who the hell this woman was, others had been there before me, but one thing I have just concluded as a result of her contact (if it is her), is that the reason she repeatedly spoke in the third person in that film, was because she may have been at Duncroft and she may have met Jimmy Savile, but if she did, then he DID NOT abuse her in any way.
So why didn't she say this back then ? The answer seems obvious does it not ? How rubbish her testimony would have sounded had she mentioned the fact that, she, I would suspect, a fairly nice looking young girl back then had met JS and managed not to have have had any bad experiences with him, NONE !
How would that have sounded on Meirion's film ? Think about that guys and gals. I'm still a bit rusty but I'm warming my Justice for Jimmy head back up. I'll leave it at that for now ... this plot just thickens !
Oh but by the way Rochelle, feel free to come back and fill in a few more blanks if you like. Here's some information I burrowed into a bit earlier !
Maybe you could fix it for the British public to see the rest of your interview with Meirion, all of it !
++
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220802/Meirion-Jones-BBC-war-astonishing-claims-reporter-aunt-saw-Savile-abuse-school.html
Note to would-be agent provocateurs - rattling my burrow only makes me burrow deeper ! By for now !
The search for Justice goes on ! Nice one Moor
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/searching-for-justice.html
https://vimeo.com/52079376
A few weeks after the DJS Savile BBC review was launched in October 2012 it's terms of reference, or remit was described by BBC News thus
Note the use of the word 'victims' in this call for 'witnesses'. It goes on
Just last night I read Ms Smith's description of a police activity around the time Brian Neil was doing his best to acquire the evidence he needed. In October 1971 he received a letter from the News of the World's solicitor
Neil never did get that 'evidence' despite his best efforts. We are not told what became of those 'tapes', but it's clear that the dame must have acquired her bits of transcripts from the Metropolitan Police. So, where are they now ? Dame S doesn't appear to be too interested in providing this information for the reader. She and her Hall dame are only being paid £700,000, who needs facts when you have an opinion to express ?
Mr Dorfman only worked on TOTP's for seven years what would he know ?
Then there's Goodwin's assistant Ronald, who, whilst confirming claims that films were shown, these were not pornographic, and that no such photos were taken of audience members
But, says dame, Howard would be gone before these photo-sessions took place, so how would he know ? Really ? this dame is trying my patience here ! At the very least she could tell us where all this allegedly took place ? Whose dressing room was used by whom for what ? Where were the ushers who accompanied the audience in and out of the building ?
Where were the dressing rooms ? According to dame, the 'stars' were situated on the ground floor, the groups were in the basement. I suspect she means TVC here not Lime Grove, but how would I know ?
Or was she ? Goodness Gracious, I thought I'd better check my first ever fact finding mission back when I didn't have a blog to call my own, and look what I came across ! Yes, really
This blogger's talking about Lime Grove
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/footsteps-across-london-pt2.html
That's not to say that Goodwin did not take naught photo's of gals AFTER the recording. The evidence upon which dame basis her conclusions, would not in my opinon, pass base with a decent CPS. Even a broke watch is right twice a day !
The above is from p63 of her report BTW !
Where are the 'stars' in all this ? In the basement, according to one ex floor manager who didn't like the way the gals were filmed
A lady production assistant found some of the folk involved in the show 'seedy'. These were the stand-ins not production staff
Then there's this revelation on page 73 a police report from 1972 parts of which the dame's been allowed to see.
Will we, the folk who have paid for this 'review' get to see this report ? If so, when and if not, why ?
The MPS report alleges that Goodwin had shown blue movies in Lime Grove in the late 60's, but so what ? No one appears to have been harmed. Certainly not these 30 gals who left the TOTP venue as intact as they went in.
Told by who ?
Enough now guys and gals. I need a break, see y'all in a week or two ! Big smiley face !
Rest in piece Harry !
Links to my three-parter 'Footsteps across London'
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/footsteps-across-london-pt1.html
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/footsteps-across-london-pt2.html
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/footsteps-across-london-pt3.html
Today another dead radio 1 disc jockey's name was dragged through the mud by the press. This time it's Tommy Vance, but where have our brave gutter hacks been all this time ? That information has been available to all of us since June 2014.
Must check out that mirror FOI, see if the contents of the response is any different from that obtained by the telegraph. Anyways, that reference to Tommy Vance in Brian Neil's report had me wondering, could he be 'Mr T' ?
Before I tell you about the, getting less illusive by the day, Mr T, let's refresh ourselves with what Neil found in 1971.
The reason Vance's named has not been blacked out is no doubt because he died in 2005 so his name like Harry Goodwin's before him, is no longer worth protecting !
Here's that anonymous letter, penned on BBC headed paper, from someone who claims to be a BBC radio 1 producer ! I'm not convinced are you ?
**
Tommy Vance still has friends, he also has a son who is not happy with the latest yewtree ish press revelation. Note the reference to Neils' 1972 conclusions
Which brings me to 'Mr T' ! I came across 'Mr T' a while back and I wasn't quite sure how to include him in previous blogs. You see, I found myself wondering, could he be Tony Blackburn ? No ! Could it be Tommy Vance, or could it be another disc jockey not even called 'T' ? after all, it seems a bit daft to protect a man's identity using one of his initials. There can't have been that many BBC disc jockeys called T ....
I recommend you get yourselves on the press archives guys and gals, the coverage of the Janie Jones/Payola trials are a hoot, even Kenny Lynch gets a mention
Is it only dead men whose reputations are up for grabs ? What about the others who are 'thought to be still alive' ? What indeed
On a lighter note - Janie Jones wrote an autobiography in 1993, oh to have been a fly on the wall in that police cell !
Needless to say Ms Jones never mentioned Sir Jimmy in her 1993 masterpiece. Meanwhile in the mirror in March 1971
