Pages

Wednesday, 25 July 2018

He's not dead, and I hope he sues ALL OF YOU

How did Sir Cliff Richard come to be investigated by the Police in the first place ? Dan Johnson hasn't named the so-called original source, and no-one appears to have the power to make him, so we'll have to make do with what's out there folks. Problem is, there's so much out there ! 'Rumours' about Cliff had been circulating for years, I read them myself on the crazy one's site, and elsewhere. But, I never published them. I'm a responsible person you see.

Let's go back to the beginning of Yewtree. After all, this investigation has been kind of established (at least to the satisfaction of Justice Mann, who prefers the Police's media officer's evidence to that of Mr Johnson), as the originating 'source' of the 'source', if you get my drift ! 


Operation Yewtree started in October 2012 following the ITV broadcast of 'Exposure - the other side of Jimmy Savile'. The Police said they would not be investigating the Savile claims because he was dead, but they would be going after living subjects. And they did, several high profile arrests followed, but NONE of these involved a 'world famous pop legend' did they ?

 
 Note the date of the 'update' a few weeks after Cliff's raid ! Coincidence ? I think not ! Please also note, that this is from the Daily Mirror who describes the complainant as 'convicted sex offender' who allegedly made this claim to Police officers in 2008. 

I include this article only as a point of reference as to the gossip online and in print around the time that Cliff's accuser had allegedly, contacted Mark Williams-Thomas. Stay with me folks. 

On the 22nd August 2014 the Telegraph published this



2013 ? Exactly when in 2013 was this allegation made to Yewtree ? I should add that the Mirror's 'sex offender' allegedly supplied Police officers with some 'list'. That would be the Elm Guest House 'list' I presume ? 


 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-savile-sex-abuse-scandal-1491904

So, the Police were allegedly investigating a pop legend as early as December 2012 ? Really ? As far as I'm aware, the Police were not even aware of any accusations until Mark WT's accuser eventually made his way to Scotland Yard in 2013. In February 2013 MWT was bragging about how he'd ran his Savile investigation 'like a criminal investigation'. The final paragraph saying 


https://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/feb/24/mark-williams-thomas-jimmy-savile 

The response on twitter ? 

 
 MWT's twitter time line became a magnet for the 'nutter bus' crowd, as I endearingly call them. Liars and shit-stirrer's is of course, a more appropriate description. How much damage have these people's gossip caused ? 


Now, here's an eye opener folks ! You know before Justice Mann issued his decision on Cliff V the BBC and SYP, he ordered a Home Affairs SElect committee to attempt to identify Johnson's original source. Of course, he wanted to KNOW if that person had actually been a serving Police officer, or someone else involved in Operation Yewtree. Well, Go Judge Mann ! 




 In this Press Gazette article the accuser was still making his way to Scotland Yard in 'late 2013' 

h


Mr Justice Mann said the singer wanted to know whether the BBC’s source was from “within Operation Yewtree” or someone who had obtained information from Operation Yewtree.
He said he had weighed Sir Cliff’s rights to a fair trial against journalists’ rights to protect sources before reaching a decision. 


All parties in High Court trial had, earlier in the month, agreed a 'ceasefire' during which a settlement might be reached. 

 The singer, who has sued the BBC and complained that his human right to respect for private life was infringed, said reporter Dan Johnson “knew full well” that information acquired from a police source had been “covertly” disclosed


The question any reasonable person would now ask is :

Why would someone involved in the the Operation Yewtree investigation wait all that time, from late 2013 until July 2014, to leak the story to Dan Johnson. Remember, we're referring to the fact that CR was being investigated, NOT the home invasion raid (which, of course hadn't as yet been conceived).

We're being asked to believe some nonsense aren't we ? Johnson admitted reading the rumours about CR online. Did he even need a Police source ? 


Anyway, that's enough from me for now. Cliff is, as I type, still alive. He can sue those who peddled nasty stories about him online. How delicious would it be, if the same person who began the Savile thing on the basis that the man was dead, so he couldn't sue, was sued himself, for this !



Happy Days 


Will Justice Mann get his man ? Who knows, we can wait !  

Sunday, 22 July 2018

*WE* are coming for *YOU* now

"We're coming for you" - or was it 'We will come for you' ? I can't remember who said these words, I think it was ex-Commander Peter Spindler. Whatever, the point is : who did he come for, who was he coming for, and how successful was his bluster ? 





"We now know"* that one of those who would be targeted as a result of that bluster would eventually get to clear his name and sue the media for invading his privacy. Well done Cliff 

  
Much has been written about Sir Cliff's case, but what I want to know is WHO was the 'source' of CR's woes ? Was it him behind Jim Davidson's similar woes ? Let's take a look at the evidence shall we guys and gals ? 

Him behind Jim Davidson's woes, according to JD and his mate in the Sun, was Mark Williams-Thomas. 


JD didn't have a BBC helicopter flying over his home, he had the press on his front doorstep ! These are extracts from his book - 'No Further Action' and it's a great read 


 You see, Jim D had done something naughty - He'd spoken out against Operation Yewtree. Big mistake Jim 


Well, JD did eventually get cleared but not before he was subjected to a shit-load of trouble. The Police were determined to build a case against him, but he was sharp and his lawyer was sharper still. In short, he was lucky, like Cliff he had the means to defend himself. He also had friends in the press

 
So, back to Cliff and the mysterious source of his woes. Here's what we know : 

1) Cliff's accuser originally contacted MWT in October 2012 following his exposure of Sir Jimmy Savile. 



The above is from The Sun 19th August 2014. And, much as it pains me to link this toilet paper, sometimes needs must.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/1036175/cliff-accused/

Now, let's check out what MWT was tweeting before Cliff's home invasion ! Facts folks, no fictions here !

Here he says he passed the allegation to Yewtree in 2013 !

 
Cliff's home was raided on 14th August ! And folks are asking the great investigator questions about his role ! 

cc

By November, he's making sure people don't forget Cliff's being investigated 


And, he's actively engaging with would-be informants online



Six months later, Thomas assumes the position of someone who knows more that your average Joe on Fleet Street. He KNOWS what's going on in the Cliff investigation, and he wants you to know he knows !


 By September, those multiple allegations are still growing in number 


 By June 2016 the Police had issued No Further Action letters to Cliff's accusers 


ALL four of them ! 


I suppose one could class four as 'multiple'. You'd think that Thomas  would have known that figure all along, he seems so close to the investigation, or he certainly likes to give that impression doesn't he ?

So, who's the source then ? Maybe we'll find out in time. Not from BBC reporter Dan Johnson though I fear. He's not a 'fundamentally dishonest man, but .... ' said Justice Mann 


Here's some further reading for you all. I can't do all this by myself 

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/sir-cliff-richard-obe-v-bbc/ 






Sir Cliff began legal action against the BBC and South Yorkshire Police a month after Police dropped their investigation. 


https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/jul/10/sir-cliff-richard-allegedly-to-sue-bbc-and-south-yorkshire-police-for-1m 

And what was MWT's response to Justice Mann's decision this week ? 

 


 But we're not all falling for MWT's sudden about turn Cliff-wise





cc

Oh, and folk have been questioning his role for a few years now 



Sooner or later the truth will prevail. In the meantime, keep 'em peeled folks. And very best wishes to everyone going through a similar hell. Let's hope Cliff's Law, will make it onto the Statute. Better still a Jimmy's Law. But that's another story for another day ! Cheers Pals x

Friday, 20 April 2018

The Instigator

Mark Williams-Thomas has been reveling in the praise his latest TV show has attracted. Least-ways, that's what was going down a few days ago when I burrowed into his Twitter TL. It's all here for them not blocked by our hero 

https://twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas?lang=en 

No one has ever been able to successfully pin down the exact reason  why Mouthwash as I call him, left Surrey Police. His wiki page has been updated more times than Jack the Ripper's, but wait .... the lowest of the low plumb new depths to bring us their take on 'Mark' The Investigator !


Much as I hate including this filthy rag on my blog, I'll wash my hands when I finish typing, it's useful reinforcing the adage - judge people by their 'friends'. That these useless beings are still peddling this nonsense, doesn't beggar belief does it ? 'lead many investigations' ?


Anyways enough of the here and nowish, today I want to focus my attentions on Mouthwash's true claim to fame. The one skill we actually KNOW he possesses and uses freely regardless of the consequences for others. Ladies and Gentlemen, sit back, and read all about Mark Williams-Thomas - The Instigator. 


Yes, here's Mouthwash in the TV show that made him a household implement - Exposure - the other side of Jimmy Savile. story of Fiona is a long one, but in short for those who cannot be bothered to read five years of blog posts, this is basically her :

She was one of the two allegedly ex-Duncroft women who agreed to do on-camera interviews claiming that Jimmy Savile was a child abuser. The two who actually met him that is. Only problem for Fiona and her enabler, being that she's a proven liar. She may have met Savile, but crucially NOT at the relevant time for the purposes of the Savile stitch-up. Read this for starters 

http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/honestly-mark.html

Even the publication of half-facts



c

MWT had no choice but to keep his most valuable Savile assets sweet did he ? Imagine Fiona or her pals deciding to break tradition and tell the truth about their obvious lies ? 

But I digress, after all, who cares about the truth especially where it concerns the dead ? And now, here's we things get interesting in two words : Cliff Richard !

Cliff is currently suing the BBC. You can read all about that elsewhere, everywhere in fact, apart from on MWT's twitter account that is. To be sure, his silence on the matter is deafening, given his interest and actual involvement in Sir Cliff's downfall ! He was after all advising Cliff's first accuser 


 Cliff's home was raided by Police on August 14th 2014. A few days later Cliff's friends came out for him in this article. Note MWT's comment



 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/17/bbc-cliff-richard-witch-hunt-live-raid-broadcast

The question everyone wants answering is : who leaked the fact that the raid was taking place to the BBC ? Not South Yorkshire police say the BBC



But, rather confusingly 



https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/aug/17/bbc-cliff-richard-witch-hunt-live-raid-broadcast

Meanwhile, in MWT land



 Next day - the accusers were said to be growing in numbers !






So basically, here's the deal : Cliff's accuser watched MWT's exposure of Sir Jimmy Savile. Doubtless, he spots an opportunity for some attention and/or cash and contacts the former 'detective'. Former Surrey Police officer MWT passes this information to the Savile cops, then hears fuck all, until low and behold - the cops raid Sir Cliff's place. 

So, what was happening from the summer of 2013 or thereabouts when it's claimed the accuser allegedly first contacted MWT and that day in August 2014 ? Here's a taster of activity on his twitter account around that time. Those of you NOT blocked by him might do a whole lot better than me, just google twitter advanced search and away you go.




He's not completely without some sense is he ? He's been very careful NOT to make any claims about Cliff since the latter decided to start suing people. But, he just couldn't resist tweeting all sorts of crap in the interim, keeping the allegations alive and inferring that the investigation bore weight. 


 Homework for someone - look up any further exchanges between 'Chantal' and Mouthwash. 


And there's so much more ! But, that's enough for me guys and gals. Some day Mouthwash will have to answer for the damage he's done, and as my standing friend often says - we can wait !

Ooops I almost forgot - this made me laugh out loud. Not everyone's impressed by the great investigator ! Thank you Digital Spy