Pages

Wednesday 4 May 2022

The Most Influential Liar : Part 4.



Film makers often describe their finished product as being  based-on either : a 'true story' or 'on actual events'. "Jimmy Savile : A British Horror Story" is such a film. Jimmy Savile was a hugely famous and much-loved - television star in Great Britain for almost half-a-century. 

There'd been gossip about him, just as there was and is, about many public figures, the difference being that the rumours and gossip that went on about him, involved his - alleged liking for : 'little girls'. Not one press article ventilating that rumour appeared until months after Savile died. Hold on to that fact reader. Not one newspaper published ANYTHING of the sort until someone got wind of Meirion Jones' story, and when they did, the press in general, still made little of it until ITV decided to make a television programme, and the rest is history, as they say.

For that reason, I've giving Mr Jones' contribution to this film special attention. After all, had it not been for him, any film based on Savile's life might have been quite different. My point being : was what Meirion Jones had on Jimmy Savile, enough to justify what he did when he died ?

He's a slippery character this Meirion Jones. Let's hear exactly what he says in this film, without the interruption of other 'witnesses'.



1)

"My dealings with Jimmy Savile started years ago. My aunt ran this very strange institution called Duncroft. I started going there when I was, sort of, probably 6 or 7.

From 1970 we would regularly visit about once a month. 

"It was very grand and yet there were bars on the upstairs windows where the girls were at night ... this was called an approved school .. a prison for 14 year old girls who'd done bad things. Some of them had done very bad things. You know at times there were child murderer's here and all sorts of things.

I found it unnerving. Some of these girls had been accused of very serious offences. When I was a little kid, I'd come here and they would be like - babysitting me while the adults went, you know, had a few drinks or a party or something".

2)


"My contact with Duncroft School and in fact Jimmy Savile, really ended in about 1976 ... I got to university, became a journalist, sort of, invested my life in it. I mean, I always remembered, what I had seen, back in the 70's. Looking at these cuttings from the Sun (On screen is the paper dated Monday April 11th 1983)  It's billed as 'the dark side of Britain's top DJ, but actually, it's a dark side that he can live with, uh, it's not a dark side that's gonna lead him to being prosecuted for anything ... safe confessions for him to have been associated with, and perhaps he then gets rid of the reporters ... he's coughed, he's admitted. 'We don't need to look at him, anymore'. He was very good at distracting people".

3) 



"This was key moment. When I read that interview that Lynn Barber had done,, I mean - she was, best interviewer in the business at that point, I just thought : 'ooo', suddenly she's mentioning these paedophile rumours. It's there in BLACK AND WHITE". (pause more music) It turns out of-course, that this was far more horrific than I could ever have imagined". 

"From that moment on, it was open, I mean : what was the real story about Jimmy Savile". (I assume he's referring to Barber's piece again). 

4)

"My investigation into Jimmy Savile, began by chance. My aunt ran Duncroft, a youth detention centre. Savile arrives when I'm probably about 16. He kept turning up. I thought it was strange. (pause, music, Jones pinning stuff to a wall as per investigators do). In the 90's I became a journalist. At that point I was working at the BBC - radio news. I remember talking with other people, celebrity gossip, sometimes you heard 'Savile underage girls', I would say : 'where do you know that from' and I would try and see if that led anywhere. But when I tried to track them down, I could never find a witness or a victim. The trail went blank when you tried to follow that trail".

"Back then I thought it was simple, I just had to get the evidence, to catch him. I didn't realise, the whole world around him, had to change, before the truth could come out".

5)

"I'd suspected that things had gone on. That there'd been sexual assaults. By Savile. BUT, we needed evidence. Most of the evidence is going to be eyewitness accounts. Of the victims, who are young and often vulnerable. 'Can we find any victims ?'".

Screen : He's dialling up the internet on Windows 94.

"Maybe once a year if I had some spare time, I'd search for Duncroft. It's one of those things on my list of 'back stories' that I returned (?) and see if I could find anything, and you cannot. There was no references.


"2009/10 I started seeing stuff popping up on Friends Reunited - an early social media network. There were hints that something had gone on at Duncroft from girls, now mature women. Nothing you could quite put your finger on, but there's something about there conversations - HINTS, that there's been a police investigation.

Now take a look at what pops up on screen as he speaks about exactly when he came upon the Duncroft Approved School Account. He actually 'joined it'. You can see the welcome message in the top right hand corner. Sorry if it's not very clear to you. It was only there for a second. I had to move fast with my camera.



The 'old perv' looks like it was been posted on the 15th September 2010 as a recent message, so we can safely assume that Jones joined this group account around that time. We'd need to see other print outs of which he appears to have hundreds, but that would be for another film, not this one, obviously. 


Bottom left-hand corner reads :


'Past Reunions at Duncroft Approved School : 

TBA Took place on 23rd March 2008 For members who left 1982-1988.

Crowns Wood School Took place on 18th October 2008. For members who left in the years 1958-2008. 

Past reunions ? The last being October 2008. Had Meirion taken a few years off searching for Duncroft stuff online, or were the entries just not juicy enough to have have him depressing that 'register now' button ?



Karin "Ha ! 'gentleman' surely don't do the kind of things HE did to teenage care home girls !". 19-?-2010.

Caro "Did you say gentleman !!! Lol". 19-09-2008. 

Jones' printouts are interesting when one compares them to the five pages of comments that were included in Appendix 12 of the Pollard Report. 









Of particular interest to me, is the comment from 'R6' dated 9th July 2011, because it's one that Jones reads.





In Pollard this comment - if it is the same one, appears much shorter than the one Jones now reads :

"I was contacted by the police but don't wanna do it on my own. I really think we ought to do something. The more girls say something the better chance we have of getting him exposed. I would love to see him get his just deserves". 

Was he reading the same comment that was in the Pollard Report ? It starts and ends the same, but the rest is different. In Pollard, we get to see the poster's tag : 'R6', but here it's just a blur. 

And, who was 'Caro' responding to in September 2008 ?

Doesn't make sense does it ? Not if your fact-checking, which isn't something that's relevant to this film. It's Jimmy Savile who's the 'tricky' one, in this script. 

What did Jones tell the Pollard Inquiry ? 






When did Karin Ward join Friends Reunited ? Was it 2010 or was it 2008 ? Jones tells us he didn't find her 'fanstory' until 2011. I wonder ?

What he told his boss a few days after Savile died :



'14 year old girls' ? They were always 14 weren't they ? Even they said they were 14, when they weren't !  Meirion Jones' star 'victim' claimed she'd been just 14 when she attended an episode of Savile's TV show. A lie she was able to maintain until she had to confirm her date of birth, on oath, before a Judge. 

Then I just happened to come across the Freddie Starr Judgement. I don't think I ever read it before. What a difference having to swear on oath to tell the truth, can have on a woman who clearly lied for a living !

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2015/1987.html



    Mr Justice Nicol :

  1. This has been the trial of claims for slander and libel brought by the comedian and entertainer, Freddie Starr, against Karin Ward. They arise out of an interview which Ms Ward gave to the BBC in November 2011 and to ITV in October 2012 and the subsequent broadcasts of parts of those interviews and also out of online publications made by Ms Ward.

    1974: the background

  1. Ms Ward was born on 25th March 1958. She had a troubled family background including, she says, sexual assault by her step father. She also shoplifted on a number of occasions. When she was about 14 she was sent to Duncroft Approved School ('Duncroft') in Surrey. There were about 25 girls at the school. The Headmistress was Margaret Jones.
  2. While Ms Ward was at Duncroft she met Jimmy Savile ('Savile'). She says that she and other girls at Duncroft were sexually abused by Savile. In return they were given cigarettes and also the opportunity to attend Savile's TV shows. Savile was particularly known for a show called 'Jim'll Fix It'. But another show was a programme called 'Clunk Click' on which guests appeared with Savile in front of a studio audience. 'Clunk Click' was not broadcast live, but recorded in advance of transmission.
  3. One episode of 'Clunk Click' was filmed on 7th March 1974. Ms Ward and about 4 other girls from Duncroft attended as part of the studio audience. On that date Ms Ward was 15. One of the guests on that episode of 'Clunk Click' was Freddie Starr. He was 32 at the time and was well known as a comedian and entertainer.


  1. Ms Ward wrote an account of some of the incidents in her life on a website called 'FanStory'. She says that she started this exercise in 2008. For that reason it is convenient to take it first. However, the Particulars of Claim pleaded that the words were only defamatory of the Claimant after 8th October 2012, by which time the Defendant says she had taken this part of her account down from the website. In the course of his closing submissions, Mr Dunham, on the Claimant's behalf, accepted that he had no evidence to contradict what the Defendant said about the date when the story was taken down. He accepted that this part of the Claimant's case could not succeed.

She 'started' 'Fanstory' in 2008 ? Did she publish it in 2008 ? Did Meirion Jones, see it ? WTF knows ? One thing he MUST have known in November 2011, was that Karin Ward was NOT 14 when she attended that TV show that Freddie Starr guested on. She was less than three weeks off her 16th birthday. 

Meirion Jones obviously didn't care about the fact that Ward told lies. All that mattered to him was the fact that she would continue to do so, on camera, in order for him to get a ten-minute slot on Newsnight. 

 

  1. On 22nd October 2012 BBC broadcast a 'Panorama' programme. It included footage of the Claimant. A narrator then said,
  2. 'Among the guests on Clunk Click were young people from hospitals and other institutions, including girls from Duncroft. Karin Ward, aged just 14, was one of them. After the show, she was invited with other young people to join more famous guests in the dressing rooms. She told Newsnight about this 11 months ago in the interview that was dropped'.

This judgement was published on the 10th July 2015. Three-and-a-half years after ITV and the BBC together, destroyed Savile's name.

Oh, and - as an aside : Williams-Thomas said on oath that Karin Ward never told him she was only 14, back then. 




Back to the film :

"At the beginning of 2011 I came across Karin Ward's account. You know, that was the real breakthrough because that was a lucid, proper story telling everything that happened. I found it cos I was googling : 'Duncroft Fanstory dot com. So now, Ive got a story written very convincingly. Ninety-nine percent of which I know is true".

Ninety-nine percent he knew to be true - really ? Here's a taster of that account from an email Jones sent to Mark Williams-Thomas on 23rd November 2011.



The Pollard Report can be quite difficult to find. Here's a link to the wonderfully informative : Appendix 12.


I hope it doesn't disappear ! 

And the rest is pretty much history as they say. 

Why did Meirion Jones set out to convince people that Jimmy Savile was a 'paedophile' ? One forms impressions of people just from reading their Twitter accounts. Jones obviously hates seeing others getting the praise he believes belongs to him and him alone. Laugh Out Loud, as they say ! 




Bless you Sylvia ! 

















 











31 comments:

  1. Not apropos of this, but of relevance is that a YouTube personality, Shaun Attwood, has brought out a documentary on Savile called 'Untouchable'. It's free to watch. If you've not heard of him, Attwood mainly produced true crime content based on interviews - sometimes quite interesting, I must say. He is closely associated with Matthew Steeples of Steeple Times. Both Attwood and Steeples have dogmatically monsterised Savile.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom I know, all I want to know about Steeples and the other one ! Thanks anyway :-)

      Delete
  2. Well done, Rabbit. You have a stronger stomach than I do.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yay! I managed to put my name.

    Brilliant Rabbit......... although trying to 'move on' there never seems to be a moment to take a breath. Who would have thought 10 years........ Thank you, as always!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don’t forget to explain Sam’s testimony, can’t wait for you to contradict her! Btw. ALL DOCUMENTS WERE FACT CHECKED AND THEY EVEN SPOKE TO ALISON LEVITT QC AND ALL OF THE WOMEN IN THAT TAPE. You seem to blame Meirion Jones, yet everything he said was checked. No mention from you about how Margaret Jones STOLE Duncroft records and it took the police 2 days to empty stuff from her house. If you watch the This Morning interview you will also see MW-T, did you miss a chance to have a go at him? Like Sally Stevens and MANY others, Margaret Jones is dead….or did you miss that too? We are very dissatisfied with your cherry-picking actions…please keep going as it’s nice to get the evidence of your views for a ‘class action’ and yes Netflix are paying!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Seriously, I have no idea what you are going on about. If I do not refer to someone in my blog, it generally means that I have no interest in them. By 'Sam' are you referring to the token alleged victim, included in this ? I'll leave your comment up for now because you have a right to challenge me. Just as I have a right to challenge whomever I disagree with. Good day !

    ReplyDelete
  6. Merion Jones said; "You know at times there were child murderer's here and all sorts of things" (referring to Duncroft). Well, it's not Mary Bell. I can't find any other UK juvenile female child killers, who could conceivably have been at Duncroft. Makin' sh*t up? Again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The whole thing may be one big mass hysterical fantasy. Psychologists of the future will be fascinated and puzzled by it all.

      Delete
    2. Well I can name at least 3 teenage female killers. A magazine wrote an article on violent teenage girls at the time…there were also girls at Duncroft who had committed other high profile crimes, no one there was sent there for anything drug related. Mary Bell did not qualify for Duncroft under the IQ component, so she was turned down.

      Delete
    3. Jones said "child killers". You can name 3 teenage female child killers from that era? Please do...

      Delete
    4. Even if we assume, Jones meant to say female "children" who committed a murder, who have you got other than Mary Bell, that would have been 15-17 yrs old between 1948 and 1976 when Barnardos took over Duncroft?

      Delete
  7. I am not prepared to name people on a public website. Look it up for yourself. Mary Bell was in Cumberlow Lodge and refused entrance to Duncroft. I guess you need to look at old magazine and press cuttings but if I knew 3, how many others?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Muderpedia; "Mary Bell was housed at the Red Bank Special Unit from February 1969 until November 1973. Red Bank was a reform school, a portion of which was high security". If you won't name people, then they only exist in your imagination. https://murderpedia.org/country-female/united-kingdom.htm

      Delete
    2. Well in my “imagination” they will have to stay. Mary Bell was 100% at Cumberlow Lodge, kept in “closed provision” and the local residents contacted local papers and cancellous about her being there. Strange how people believe all they read!

      Delete
    3. Yes, as stated in Wikipedia and other sources; "Bell was initially detained in a Durham remand home before being transferred to a second remand home in South Norwood [Cumberlow] She was then transferred to Red Bank secure unit, a young offenders institution in Newton-le-Willows, Merseyside, in early 1969, where she was the only female among approximately 24 inmates. Bell would later claim that she was sexually abused by a member of staff and several inmates while incarcerated at this facility, claiming the sexual abuse began when she was aged 13. In November 1973, at age 16, she was transferred to a secure wing of HM Prison Styal in Cheshire". That's true. But I don't see any evidence, that any female juveniles who committed murder were housed at Dunwood. And you won't provide any, so Merion Jones is just telling fantasy tales again.

      Delete
    4. Duncroft, sorry.

      Delete
    5. Well that means you have consigned over 100 girls, 25-30 staff and even more who worked for the Home Office to ‘fantasy’! So glad you feel content to act in such away just to vilify Meirion Jones and clear Savile. I am glad that most people don’t live in your totalitarian society and have some sense. Just accept that the site Murdererpedia is not accurate and don’t forget it is not legal to name a person under a certain age unless named by the Judge in their case…so how could it be correct? When you jump to conclusions, or cherrypick the contents with only limited knowledge you will always get a biased opinion. I and others are very happy to know that the Netflix film was expertly researched and just because it had Meirion in it was ‘wrong’ I think you are very, very narrow minded and limited in your views…if hundreds accuse one man, not just from Duncroft, or as you state “Dunwood” then they will not agree with your personal views and one sided comment, they are wrong and it must be in their “imagination”. Shame Home Office registers do not agree with you, nor others in the know!

      Delete
    6. Murderpedia doesn't claim to be a comprehensive listing, nor have I made such a claim about it. But I'm very familiar with the peculiar smell that comes off of claims, that someone possesses 'secret knowledge' of matters that they "can't divulge" publicly for whatever excuse. "I know something you don't know, but I can't (or won't) disclose it publicly" - in whatever form. I came to know it, working with our Integrated Intelligence Unit detectives from 1988 to 1992, investigating bogus claims about alleged "satanic abuse cults". It's the smell of bovine excreta, frankly, and the whole Jimmy Savile = Freddy Krueger saga stinks to the high heavens.

      Delete
    7. Well said Justin..... Bravo!

      Delete
    8. Well, if you are not talking BS do name the anthropologist in charge of the Satanic Abuse claims…maybe we are related!

      Delete
    9. Oh dear…don’t you know? You should also be aware that their stepchild works for the BBC and is very good friends with Meirion….you dropped the ball there…sniff…sniff…I smell more BS from you.

      Delete
  8. Hi Anon - I've checked with Netflix, they are NOT paying for a class action....... Lie one exposed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry pass the inco pad…I have wet myself laughing….and who did you check with, perhaps we should exchange names. No lies or flies on me!

      Delete
  9. Dear me, "no lies or flies on me"!!! How absurd you are.

    How about we start with your name eh? Then we can see who you've dealt with at Netflix. I guess their legal team will want a word with you for spreading untruths....."Netflix are paying for a class action"- Netflix have been made aware and have a copy of this blog and your comment. - please carry on, this is hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I’m still laughing at you. I spoke to 2 people from their legal team today, they say they don’t know you as I also sent them a screenshot of this blog and also Moor Larkins…they laughed louder than me and referred to a “Savile deniers as a bunch of oxymorons”. Their words not mine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure what this is all about, but as a general observation, it's important to bear in mind that mass abuse accusations have become a lucrative industry for the legal profession, so I'm sure they do laugh and scoff at "Savile deniers"! You can't really blame them, can you. But it could well be that the laughter hides, as it often does, troubled consciences.

      The reality is that anybody expressing informed scepticism about it all represents a threat to a very profitable line of business, also threatens the image of the legal profession, and perhaps most important of all, pricks their consciences. It would not look good for the legal profession if it turned out that law firms had been earning fees on the basis of essentially fraudulent claims. Not that this would mean the lawyers themselves had done anything wrong in any legal or ethical sense, but it wouldn't look good in the field of public perception, nor would it look very moral.

      I'm not a 'denier'. I don't believe that is a rational or safe position to take. I am a sceptic, which I believe is sensible given the evidence available. I do wonder who will be 'laughing loudest' in the end, though I fear we will all be dead and buried before a more balanced and rational view is taken of this and other controversies.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for that To. A refreshingly balanced and thoughtful comment. Keep them coming.

      Delete
    3. I am trying to be balanced, but I missed something important and it's only now looking back at the 'Anonymous' comment that it stands out. Isn't it interesting that this Anonymous person, and the lawyers he or she knows, see fit to laugh about the subject? Abuse, bullying and sexual assault isn't an amusing subject.

      Of course, there are certain contexts where in which it is open to comedy and satire. I think the song 'Jimmy Savile and the Sexy Kids' by KATG is tasteless but pretty funny, but that's just humorous escapism. The actual acts are not funny in themselves. If what they say about the late Mr Savile is actually true, I find nothing funny about it.

      And if what they say about the late Mr Savile is not true, that's not funny either.

      I just find the attitude quite concerning. What are they laughing at? I think it's what psychologists call projection - their troubled consciences coming to the surface.

      Delete
  11. I'm sending your nasty comment now - let's see shall we, I see you've omitted your name...... Again!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The constant mentions of Cumberlow Lodge suggests it must be Sue Melling, aka Fiona

      Sue Melling Says:
      June 29th, 2012 at 4:06 am
      I was at Cumberlow Lodge in the early 1970’s. There were three groups, Mrs Wyatts, Mrs Aberccelli and Mr Batterby’s. There was also a 4th group called C.P. Closed Provision. Tom Hart was the Superintendant and I have my Cumberlow assessment. I threw a fire extinguisher at the window in the smallest group room (Mrs Wyatts) and it bounced off the perspex window! On my birthday my grandmother brought me a cake, it was cut into so many peices by the staff, it looked like a pile of crumbs. I was not allowed many letters, that were opened and read, or birthday presents. We wore work dresses, bathed daily and much much more. My memory is so good because I can not forgive Tom Hart for throwing me backwards over a sofa and knocking me out on a table. NO MEDICAL TREATMENT. I was carried down to the cell by Vinters. I spent 3 days there and you must think my crime was awful. No, it was a remand home but I was there for assessment as I ran away from my previous placement and was sent to Cumberlow Lodge under a 28 day place of safety order. I was given a section 2 care order and then spent January to April there. Tom Hart was given an OBE for his services to children. That man was a bully who scared the girls and the staff. nearly 40 years on and that man scarred me more than my previous or past life. The country honoured him, I wonder if they knew the truth?

      https://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.com/2013/04/exposition-pt9.html

      Delete