Anyone sick of me banging on about 'Fake letter Fiona' yet ? Well hang on to your hats because, in the course of further burrowing I've found out a few interesting things !
It all started on Saturday night when this interesting exchange took place between; Meirion Jones, a tweep called 'Father Jack' and Peter Jukes (a journalist who spent every day tweeting from the hacking trial).
Jones makes a lot of the fact that the article exposing Fiona's fake letter was written LONG after his expose about Savile was pulled. Is this man a fool or is he just desperate to keep his little game going for as long as possible ?
For Jones the mere 'allegation that Savile was a paedophile' was 'enough' 'hard evidence' to justify ruining this man's name posthumously !
But let's look a little moor closely at that one tweet in particular where Jones defends Karin Ward's 'credibilty' on the basis that he claims, she never went to the Police and thus could NOT have claimed to have received a letter later acknowledge to be fake (if it ever existed in the first place), but what of Jones other alleged 'VICTIMS'/Witnesses ? Where does this leave THEM ? And I say them, because according to APP 12 of the Pollard Report, Fake Fiona was NOT the only one alleged to have received the same !
P9
The importance of the existence of this letter, or rather it's contents cannot be underplayed. Peter Rippon et al would surely have pulled the Newsnight expose MUCH earlier had he been aware that Jones was being lied to by at least ONE of the women eager to go on camera.
Here's a few more of those emails demonstrating the letter's importance !
I take it (R2=Fiona) ?
The CPS finally confirmed that Jones' women were lying about the CONTENTS of the letter. Cue, Newsnight dropped post haste and the rest is history ... only it isn't !
The tweet that started the above exchange between 'Father Jack and MJ was this one
Jukes takes a keen interest in all things hacking related. I'm becoming moor interested in the subject myself especially when i came across this name in the course of my Pollard Report burrowing !
The above was lifted from an email sent to Jones by his trainee investigator Hannah
The same Jaime Pyatt who is currently on trial with other Sun Newspaper Journalists for :
'conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office by approving or
making payments to a variety of public officials.'
And, what does any of this have to do with the Savile story ? Read on !
https://inforrm.wordpress.com/2014/11/17/sun-six-trial-sun-news-editor-tells-jury-he-did-not-know-cash-was-for-serving-police-officers-martin-hickman/
No story was ever published ? What does he mean ? Had the Sun tried to publish the Duncroft story before Jimmy died ? Is this the answer ?
http://hackinginquiry.org/comment/only-introduction-of-2010-bribery-act-made-it-quite-clear-to-sun-journalists-that-they-should-not-pay-public-officials/
Now guys and gals I'm not sure WHAT to make of all this and I welcome your comments. Moor Larkin stumbled across Mr Pyatt before and that's why the inclusion of his name in App 12 made me burrow in a new field for a bit !
Peter Jukes aka Hacking trial tweeter extraordinaire, took a keen interest in the Savile/BBC Newsnight fiasco. I know this because he reminded all and sundry on Saturday night about his work with Miles Goslett !
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/16/jimmy-savile-scandal-net-tightens-on-new-york-times-ceo-mark-thompson.html
For some light entertainment the reader may wish to read the rest of the Jukes/Cole conversation ! It made me smile anyway
https://twitter.com/peterjukes/status/536247998104489984?lang=en-gb
Last night at a rather plush venue an award ceremony took place
Mark Williams Thomas forewarned us of this event on twitter
By yesterday those FIVE very brave women had become TWO
Even I was SHOCKED to receive a tip-off last night as to the identity of the TWO !
YES, guys and gals, Fiona aka fake letter Fiona, awarded for her bravery !
But, it gets worse ! Because the second awardee is this woman Sue Thompson the allegedly ex-BBC employee who appeared in Exposure NOT as an alleged 'victim' but a witness !
Anyways, this is how it went. You can't watch the video but we are given a lowdown on the event as it happened !
http://www.bestdaily.co.uk/your-life/news/a610571/live-the-best-bravest-women-awards-2014.html
How's about that then Guys and Gals ! At first I was quite horrified that Thomas had FIXED IT for these liars to receive an award for their part in Jimmy's downfall, until that is I realised that this was NOT an official ceremony supported by the powers that be but a largely media led event, sponsored by a UK woman's magazine !
No pics of Fake letter Fiona or Sue then Mark ?
Ruth does not tell us which category Sue and Fake letter Fiona come under ! Maybe Thomas pulled some strings and managed to get his heroine's in at the last minute. After all, there was at least one woman there who deserved the title 'brave' !
Another PR stunt pulled off by the ex-cop who was charged and found not guilty of the offense of blackmail !
Someone has been spending a huge amount of time searching through the BBC film archives have they not ?
And where there's Savile muck there's Meirion !
Not the first time Jones has commented on Bateman !
The episode of Jim'll Fix it at the centre of this latest attempt at muck-raking is this one - Episode 16 Season 6
BUT GUYS and gals READ that first sentence again. Harding was not only a guest on JFI, he has links to ROYALTY !
And, who should Jones be tweeting about again today ?
Somehow, Bateman has apparently spoken to the man and woman whose fix it request was allegedly "set up" by inferance as a means of getting this sex offender on national television ! One of the first to comment is .... you guessed it, the compo solicitors : Slater Gordon !
No reason is explored as to WHY these two kids would have been "set up" in this way. They confirm that NOTHING happened to them to them during the show. Indeed, their words actually corroborate a previous assertion that ALL children were CHAPERONED at all times during their visit to the show !
Hardly good news for KEVIN SCOTT (the boy scout) who claimed Jimmy abused him ! I wonder if he is one of Ms Dux' compo claimants ?
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/10/15/jimmy-savile-molested-boy-scout-kevin-cook-when-he-was-just-9-pictures_n_1966046.html
It will be interesting to read the 'FULL STORY' surrounding this article. Bateman did manage to speak to 'two sources' from the show !
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30051756
Meirion appears to have it in for Prince Charles ! I wonder if he got his bag back ?
Ms Dux unsurprisingly did NOT respond to my question about what was and what wasn't said in the High Court last Tuesday ! But her firm did publisher this on November 6th 2014 by way of an update on the case !
But what of the 'fraudulent claims' Ms Dux. What do you not say about them ?
'considerable amount of scrutiny by independent experts' ! Pray tell us more about this 'scrutiny' and the 'experts' you have used for the task Ms Dux !
http://www.slatergordon.co.uk/media-centre/news/2014/11/jimmy-savile-compensation-scheme-ruling-due/
I seem to recall Peter Garsden blabbing on about the 'checks and balances' his firm would apply to claims submitted to his firm. Leigh Day Solicitors also confirmed that all claimants would have to supply 'credible evidence' that they had been 'abused'
But I've covered the same in previous blog posts have I not ?
http://rabbitaway.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/upon-further-scrutiny.html
The 'scheme' has FAILED and no amount of false gesticulations of grief for the claimants will pass muster with the High Court Appeal Judges. Well, at least that's what I hope !
Onwards !
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2827079/Just-22-58-payout-claims-against-Jimmy-Savile-accepted-amid-warnings-estate-swallowed-legal-fees-leaving-genuine-victims.html
Only 22 out of 58 ? How many will be 'accepted' when proper 'scrutiny' is allowed ?
WHY is no-one reporting what was said yesterday, the second day of a hearing which resulted in a 'reserved decision' that is, the Judges need more time and/or information in order to come to a clear decision. There was just ONE announcement made by a sky journalist who did not appear to have attended the hearing
Of course, Ms Dux had her say later in the evening !
Now I was not at the hearing yesterday but I have been told by someone who was that the Judges said no such thing as 'no doubt he abused many'. They were not there to consider the compensation claims they were there to consider whether Nat West was doing their job as executor of Jimmy's estate, properly !
On the first day a BBC reporter attended and tweeted the following
One article I found put a bit more meat on the bones of the general press reportage. I have not seen these words reported ANYWHERE ELSE !
Well done YEP !
http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/national/call-to-scrutinise-savile-claims-1-6932311
The Law Lords are concerned with the Law not claimants fraudulent or otherwise. They will hopefully arise at the right decision. In the meantime, the corrupt will do anything they can to muddy the waters !
The top is from Slater Gordon the bottom Irwin Mitchell Solicitors. I see Lix has LOST FIVE of her claimants since David Rose exposed the existence of 'fraudulent claims'. Interesting days Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury !
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2817166/Former-cancer-patient-said-Savile-saved-life-wants-60-000-sex-abuse-latest-questionable-claim-against-estate.html
I have challenged Ms Dux on her remarks last night. I have received no answer !
