Pages

Monday, 14 July 2014

A little bit of Fry and Capurro !


Strewth the cat was certainly unleashed among the pigeons the other night when 'national treasure' (that's what they call you in England before they decide to label you a PREDATORY SEX OFFENDER) Stephen Fry stunned an audience at a LABOUR PARTY FUNDRAISER  with this


Mr Fry doesn't pull any punches, he knows what's been going on in this country and he's not afraid to say it ! I would pay serious money to be able to get in a time machine and be able to see ex DPP Keir Starmer's face as the national treasure continued !


The above is from the Daily Mail maybe they thought they could stir up a bit more hatred by publishing Fry's outburst. If so, that plan has backfired if the BEST RATED COMMENTS are anything to go by !




 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2690107/Fry-stuns-Labour-gala-hits-sex-abuse-investigation-Miliband-rebukes-TV-star-attacks-former-DPP.html

Everything comes to those who wait. The general public are waking up now and nothing and no one can stop the truth escaping from the censorship prison cells wherein it was placed on never ending remand on October 3rd 2012.

Mr Fry is not the first well know celebrity to question the Yewtree witch hunt. Indeed, I had quite forgotten about another BRAVE man who spoke out within weeks of the ATTACK ON SIR JIMMY.


 Like any professional comic, Mr Capurro handled his hecklers (see  the comments) with great wit and aplomb.

 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/scott-capurro/defending-jimmy-savile_b_2302125.html

Scott showed his support for Fry last night with the following tweet 


Remembering his brave article, I tweeted him back. I know he saw my response because he retweeted it. Thank you Scott !


Anyone who spoke up for Sir Jimmy Savile back in 2012 was depicted in the press as a bit, well mad. Remember this brave man ?


Mr West defended his exhibition and Jimmy. Well done Sir !

 From the Islington Gazette - the link is too long to include here !
 
At the start of the year I predicted that we would see Jimmy Savile and the word INNOCENT in the same sentence. We are seeing it more and more guys and gals. The game is on as they say ! Our struggle has come a long way ! "Onwards !"


 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/10/26/jimmy-savile-innocent-art-show_n_2021509.html
 

Sunday, 13 July 2014

Framing Franey !


One interviewee who contributes the most to Bill's Team is Bob Barber. There are at least a dozen pieces of verbal testimony ascribed to him. We are not told what period he worked there but, it's clear he was a nurse whilst PM was still boss (until 1981) becoming at some point, head of security. 


Barber did not like Savile he makes no bones about it. He was NOT happy at his presence in the 70's and he was NOT happy about his role in the task force.


Yes, that was hearsay evidence they managed to include there. Mr Barber is full of tittle tattle and must have enjoyed the opportunity to settle some old grievances. The second extract is from P32 BTW  You may want to join me here !

 https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/323458/Broadmoor_report.pdf

Broadmoor is described not as one hospital but '23 federal institutions' each very much separate from the others. It is suggested that security may not have been as tight on some wings/wards as on others. Barber again supplies this snippet of gossip !

 I wonder if Jimmy avoided your ward/s Bob ?

After describing the nasty attitudes displayed by some staff towards what they regarded as 'scum' (patients) the report makes this leap of imagination (top P36)


Did they speak to any of these 'hostile' ex-staff ? So far, no proof of any incidents of looking the other way during abusive/inappropriate behaviour !

What we do have are more examples of the kind of behaviours Jimmy displayed elsewhere; exaggerating, clowning around and, worst of all; wearing a shell suit to someone's wedding !

I almost laughed out loud reading the next first sentence of the following extract. After a preamble of grooming type, predatory behaviours the team make this startling FINDING !


But, at least they admit the fact that most of what they are hearing is 'rumour' and hearsay !

Here is 6.42 make of it what you will. I guess, made up reports are better than none at all !



Bill's team are having none of it choosing one set of staff testimony best suiting their remit as shown by the following

The team cut to the chase on P46 when the era of the Task Force and the subsequent appointment of a new General manager in 1988-89 is put under scrutiny.

Enter Cliff Graham (deceased) the senior Civil servant in charge of Mental Health with the DHSS (Dept of Health and Social Security) 


Several pages of finding no evidence of any real or suspected sexual abuse by Savile and we finally get to something that actually DID HAPPEN and it's nothing to do with Jimmy at all. But the man in question was Jimmy's friend. Jimmy got Alan Franey the job as General Manager. HERE WE GO !

P55 

In 5 pages Alan Franey's professional personal reputation is torn to shreds. If I were Mr Franey, I would be seeking legal advice with a view to a defamation claim because the authors of this report repeat gossip that appears to have little NO SOLID supporting evidence !

The most disturbing and damaging testimony involves what is referred to on P58 as 'The Hill Case' !

In short Nurse Hill (now dead) is alleged to have engaged in lesbian relationships with patients. She was say the gossips, promoted despite this inappropriate behavour because she was FRIENDLY with Franey who, by implication must have turned a blind eye or worse !


Bear in mind that this is second hand information, in other words gossip. Contradictory gossip at that, because despite the informant (ward Sister) indicating anyone reporting such matters would be ignored, Hill is indeed eventually subjected to a disciplinary process and dismissed.

The authors don't disclose WHICH 'contemporaneous press articles' they used in regard to publicity at the time and they appears frustrated by the lack of first hand evidence now available !

They suspect a cover up and cite more gossip ! I'm on P61 now BTW 


And it's not just Franey whose lack of recollection is called into question. The Team is left speculating as to what was the eventual outcome of the case. One possibility being that an 'IRREGULAR PAYMENT' may have been made by the hospital by way of settlement 

The authors' verdict : Jimmy is guilty and Franey is too !

Alan Franey repeatedly denies that ANY CLAIMS of ABUSE by Jimmy Savile were reported to him or the hospital management. The evidence backs him up but this FACT is not acceptable to investigators who FAIL to consider all the angles.

This morning I became aware that Steven George (see previous blog post 'Convincing Bill') is/was the daughter of a TORY MP. Moreover he claims that his father (now dead) ABUSED HIM BEFORE SENDING HIM off to BMH to be abused by Savile. Worser than worse, his dad's name MIGHT BE in Dickens' dossier !

 http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/488481/EXCLUSIVE-MP-daughter-sexually-abused

Strange HE never mentioned this in any of his previous (and numerous) interviews. Stranger still, that Bill Kirkup's team did not PICK UP on this in their interviews with 'PATIENT A ? Perhaps he did not tell them. Perhaps he is NOT 'A'. If he isn't let him say so, he has nothing to lose, certainly NOT his anonymity.

Bill should let us know too ! After all, the NHS/Dept of Health will have doubly failed Steven nee Alison Pink if they allowed an already abused child to be abused again in one of their Hospitals ?

As Moor Larkin often says - "I think we should be told ! " 

One man who worked at BMH but whose testimony only warranted a few lines about car washing and the like is Don Bennett. Mr Bennett knew Jimmy Savile very well, probably a lot better than most. He was fond of Jimmy and I think it's only fair we hear his voice one more time at least.



http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local-news/true-gent-sir-jimmy-a-4206950

 

 


 




 
 
















Thursday, 10 July 2014

Terms of endearment

After discovering the jewel in the crown that was APP 12 of the Pollard Report I made damn sure that one of the first things I did with the BMH Report was to go STRAIGHT to the appendices. I'm so glad I did because I found this little gem. A letter written shortly after Jimmy Savile first visited BMH on FRIDAY 13th September 1968.

Hurrah a FACT, PROOF something tangible at last ! The man who wrote this letter is the late Dr Patrick McGrath (PM) described by his son as 'the tenth and last medical superintendent of what was then called Broadmoor Lunatic Asylum, in 1957.' 


So, more or less, everything that I have written about Jimmy's initial involvement appears to be correct. He was asked to come by the patients. The then boss of the institution permitted his visits and, most importantly, monitored them and the effect that they had on the people who he spent his whole life helping; his patients. NOTE that word for future reference folks 'PATIENTS' not PRISONER's, it's important !

So, there's 'Britt' the entertainments officer about whom Jimmy fondly remarks on the back of that record 



It also confirms Jimmy's immediate affinity with the patients he met. I hope someone finds that episode of TOTP wherein he gives a secret signal to them. Imagine the joy those otherwise poor souls felt knowing that someone off the telly was actually thinking of them !
I wonder what PM would think about the findings of the report. He sounds like a man of purpose and integrity. He was, after all the real BOSS OF BROADMOOR up until his retirement in 1981. So his authority spanned twelve of the years JS was involved in BM and, seven of the years that Savile was alleged to be at the 'PEAK' of his alleged offending (1966/76).
Whether PM personally disliked JS as his son says, a level of TRUST was built up !
None of the senior folk involved with BM in these early years was available to speak to Bill's team. Most of them if not all, are dead making them easy targets for scapegoating despite the fact that NO OFFICIAL complaints were made about Jimmy Savile whilst he was there.
The testimony provided by various staff members indicates that whilst JS was tolerated by some, many were not happy at all. One thing that the authors of the report make abundantly clear however is that, whether the staff liked Jimmy's presence or not PM's judgement and authority was NEVER CHALLENGED or questioned at the time and this was a fault of the system that prevailed AT THE TIME as well as individuals such as PM who really should have known better !
The bias of the politically correct report makers is evident throughout the document. All patients were subject to harsh treatment and conditions at Broadmoor but it's the women's wards that is of particular interest to them Page 35

The report fails to mention that the same thing happened to the men as part of the admission process. How do I know that ? Well, I have Peter Thompson's book ('Bound for Broadmoor') He entered the institution in 1966. Here's how he describes that first bath !

'I was taken along a highly polished floor to a bathroom on the third floor. Here I was told to strip, while the male nurses present (I later learnt) kept an eye open for any identifying birthmarks or deformity'(p87)

Mr Thompson describes other interesting FACTS about BM at this time. He came up against PM when he challenged the rules in regard to letters ! YES readers, BM patients' letters were subject at this time to censorship and they were only allowed to send TWO PER WEEK ! 

'Dr McGrath refused to alter the rule. I said that I would approach the management. "I am the management," he told me. (P97)

PT provides quite a bit of information about the conditions and physical layout of the hospital. Overcrowding was a huge problem :
'The dormitory too was over-crowded, and there was a lot of homosexuality going on quite openly. (P100)

The next passage I found quite startling not because of the bomb but the fact that he had to WRITE to the 'chief male nurse' :

'I wrote to the chief male nurse and told him I had reason to believe that a patient was manufacturing a bomb in the hospital' after becoming 'chairman of the Patients' escape committee' !

OK I know I've gone off piste for a while there but I wanted to give you an insider's view of BMH from around the time that Jimmy first appeared. I have not seen any reference to Mr Thompson's useful books anywhere in the report. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong by all means !

One man who had a great deal to say to Bill's team is Bob Barber 'former nurse and head of security' ! And it's not just Jimmy Savile that he slates in his copious testimony. I'll cover what he (and others) has to say not only about the dead but the very much alive Alan Franey !

APOLOGIES FOR THE LAYOUT OF THIS POST. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO REMOVE THESE ANNOYING WHITE BOXES. Any advice will be gratefully accepted ! I will edit IF/when I find out how to fix this ! "Onwards !" 











 


 
 
 


Thursday, 3 July 2014

Convincing BILL !


Goodness Gracious me ! You go looking for one story and you find one even more interesting ! 

I thought it was time to see where one of Jimmy's earliest accuser's might fit into Bill's Report. For those who don't know about Steven George he was born a she and her name was Alison Pink and well, Moor Larkin's has covered his/her story before so you may want to read this !

 http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-lunatic-fringe.html?view=flipcard

Here's an early report of the story ten days after Exposure aired

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19938255

Mr Georges story however does NOT MATCH any of the investigated claims in Bill's report, unless, George has got his own age wrong !


http://www.channel4.com/news/broadmoor-patients-perfect-victims-for-savile-abuse

George would have been 17 in 1969 ! There are three different accounts of similar content from three different 'ex patients' !



Patient 'D' describes 4 or 5 'assaults' but these occur in 1987. The third patient 'E''s is alleged to have taken place in the 'early 1990's !


http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/276786/Pervert-called-the-Godfather-of-Broadmoor

In the Guardian the incident corresponds with 'Patient B' 



http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/oct/15/jimmy-savile-police-broadmoor-rape

How does Bill's team describe 'B' and her (his account)



CLEAR and CONVINCING ?

Maybe 'B' is not Steven/Alison who knows ! What we do KNOW is that Steven has made a new claim since Rolf Harris' conviction on Monday that, he too visited BMH at bedtime !


Bill was aware that Rolf visited BMH in 1973 but his Report was still published days before the trial ended ! 



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/rolf-harris-may-have-watched-patients-undress-in-broadmoor-hospital-visit-with-jimmy-savile-9576747.html

IF George is 'B' then his evidence about what may or may not have happened in 1969 or the early 70's is anything but, 'CONVINCING'

More bedtime stories next time Guys and gals !

 Hold up - there is NO WAY that that photo is of Jimmy Savile or RH in 1973 !!!

ADDENDUM added at 17.26 GMT

George does appear to be Patient 'B' as the following article includes information about Lancaster Ward !

 http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2012/10/15/uk-transgender-ex-broadmoor-patient-talks-of-jimmy-saville-abuse/


Wednesday, 2 July 2014

Convincing Kate !



The West London Mental Health NHS Trust and the DOH (Dept of Health) began two separate investigations as a result of the television show 'Exposure - the other side of Jimmy Savile' in October 2012. The two investigations became one the following month and was led by Dr Bill Kirkup. A thousand 'files of evidence' and NINETEEN months later their report was published. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/323458/Broadmoor_report.pdf

I shall begin my examination of the 139 page report with the breakdown of individuals contacted by the team as contained in APP 2 (Page 86/139)


Of those 300 individuals only 70 had face to face interviews P13/139



The six 'third parties' were not named for some reason but were described on P14 as -


The next paragraph on the following page left me confused. The author refers directly to 'Exposure', work this out if you can !

What ? Did I read that correctly ? Did the program makers not provide anything more than a 'summary'. Time to don that burrowing apparel again !

Good thing I spent a few hours going through MWT's Exposure Update in an earlier blog post because the above disclosure let me straight back to a claim made by a Broadmoor patient. I re watched the film again determined to compare it with Bill's teams findings, and look what I found !


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwaT-mfqJpo

Scroll along to the time above guys and gals. MWT introduces this anonymous woman as a 'former patient in BM in the 1970's. She describes instances of JS walking in whilst female patients were bathing. Male staff were in attendance as was the norm but "he was just joking with the staff and looking at you".

MWT then gets to the point announcing that JS "went beyond leering and abused her on one occasion" 

The 'assault' is said to have taken place in the Day room. 'Kate' describes Savile putting his arm around her trying to touch her breast. "Then he tried to put his hands between my legs ... I stood up I just said no "

MWT describes Kate reporting the incident to a member of staff and finding herself in solitary confinement for several months as a consequence. She was, say Thomas, "so scarred by the incident she tried to kill herself but staff stopped her" 


Details of all the 'ASSAULTS' are listed starting on P39/139 in the report. 'Kate' has become G but, does 'Kate' even exist ?



 Despite not wishing to be interviewed by the investigators, Kate's story appears to have been accepted not only as fact but as a 'serious assault' P42/139 !


You can read the other allegations yourself or you can join me next time and we'll go through them together. But, here's a thing ! WHY was Kate so reluctant to speak to the team ? After all, she was prepared to go on the telly. 

I'll let you guys think about that one ! I'm hanging around Broadmoor for a while, then I'm off back oop North, Leeds to be precise !