Sunday, 31 July 2016

Stick MY brick somewhere else pal

Amazing how one can change one's mind in the matter of a few days isn't it ? When I first heard about Ken Lynch I thought he was a shit, then my opinion changed and I decided he was just another victim of the Savile stitch-up. Today I'm confused, after realising that Mr Lynch's change of heart didn't just happen last week or even last year, but within weeks of exposure
I did laugh out loud at the irony of one of Jimmy's Stoke Mandeville hospital appeal bricks finding it's way in (and out) of the walls of a sex-shop just off the A1 and presumably with Ken's parish ?

 The story of this particular brick gets better in the telling
Yes, here he is with his own brick in 2011

Back in the days when Jimmy was Sir Jimmy and many of his associates bragged about their association, to the point of getting their knickers in a twist about a brick

Back to October 2012 and those few days/weeks when Lynch  defended Savile.
'after a damning 2015 report .. ' ? Now surely that cannot be true, Lynch had joined forces with the sex shop proprietor to have the darned brick sold in 2012

So now, I'm kinda back to my original position on Mr Lynch. Maybe I'm wrong to feel this way and I certainly mean the old man no harm. I'd have said he was another 'victim' of the Savile stitch up had I not come across those earlier articles. That and the fact that this latest version of events just happened to be published on the very day that the compensation payments were decided in the High Court.

And of course, compensation claimants claims are assessed before being accepted by lawyers such as Ms Dux ?

I think Mr Lynch is an attention seeker myself, because whilst looking for a suitable image to close, I find this from 2006 ! Make of it what you will 
I wonder if anyone has demanded the Biggleswade Post Office remove their brick ?

Monday, 25 July 2016

Back to Jersey AGAIN !

Sometimes I wished I'd never started this. The sensation lasts less than a few seconds because I know what I'm doing is right, still ...
Enough of my troubles, because last night I received some very important information that could put a very different light on the Dee Coles yarn. Someone calling themselves 'Dee Coles', living in Worthing has a Facebook page. She also contributes to sites like Trip Advisor. Whatever, I'll come back to that later. What I really want to know is 
How the hell Savile was able to travel to Jersey with his campervan, without the necessary PERMIT ? You see, even now, even residents themselves have to ask permission just to have a caravan, I kid you not. Something to do with affecting hotel trade/tourism I think. If this is how it is now, what was it like in 1972 ?

I cannot say for definite, as yet, but I'm guessing that Jimmy NEVER took his campervan to Jersey. It shouldn't be that hard to check, I wonder if Osbourne Clarke bothered to ? I mean it's not that much to ask is it ? And an awful lot hangs on this, wouldn't you agree ? 

There are various tales doing the rounds post October 2012, involving Jimmy and the channel Islands, mainly Jersey. The thing is, only Dee's involves a motor home/caravan. Here's another version by some other anonymous accuser

 That one involved Guernsey, as did this little number 
Did Mr Collins ever find Jimmy's hidden stash I wonder ? Doesn't look like it does it ?
 Strange that Mr Collins didn't attempt to find Jimmy's cash in 2008 when he represented all those other alleged victims of sexual abuse in Jersey. He did so try to interest as many claimants as possible.
Last week, the High Court gave permission for 78 claims to be paid. 78 out of an original 211 (just 3 shy of the 'crimes' attributed to Jimmy by Scotland Yard in January 2013). What happened to all the others ? Were the unlucky 133 claimant's stories so ridiculous, even Osbourne Clark didn't dare ? I'm still not convinced that the scrutiny process was as thorough as it could have been, I don't care who says otherwise. After all, we don't KNOW do we ? We're not allowed to know !

 Did anyone bother to ask Jimmy's friends if he brought a caravan with him to Jersey ? He was there often enough by all accounts, and everyone seemed to enjoy his visits. Oh, and NO his mother didn't have a home there, ever !
Meanwhile, everyone is pissed because the lawyers got the lions share of Jimmy's charity money, while his alleged victims, who weren't in it for the money anyway, get so little ! 
Wonder how much Dee Coles got ? How sad would it be if someone were to find some clear evidence that her story cannot possibly be true ? Go for it guys and gals !

Why would Jimmy have gone to all the trouble of taking his van to Jersey, getting the permit etc etc, just to stay in a hotel ? And don't tell me he parked it in the car park but didn't sleep in the hotel. I wonder if some of the inspiration for that yarn came from the Louis Theroux film ? That bit where Jimmy does that macho bit of sleeping in a freezing cold van in sub-zero temperatures near Fort William ! More questions than answers ... onwards !


Sunday, 24 July 2016

Payday for the lawyers ! LOL

It's out guys and gals, the payments have been agreed, and I think it's safe to say that they'll be quite a few disappointed 'claimants' out there. At least TWO of Liz Dux's claims must have been rejected because just 166 got the go-ahead from the judge on Thursday (her firm alone had 168).
This is the Sunday Times' header from this morning. It's pay to view the whole thing, but the mail has the same information for free so let's go with that one eh ? 

This next bit needs a bit more investigation, maybe them at the pay to view, folk explained it better. Is some of the estate going to the BBC etc ?
Goodness, gracious, just £1000,000 split between 166 claimants. I'm crap at maths but I reckon that's about £9000 per claimant maybe less. Not sure what Dux means in this next bit, she's obviously trying to reassure her customers about something.  Wouldn't want any loose mouths contacting the press wing now would we ?
'No deductions' ? What does she mean by that ? Tax maybe ? Never mind, 'closure' apparently awaits her customers next week when they get paid !

And she just couldn't help having that pop at the beneficiaries of the estate'. Them that was supposed to get his money that is, his charity and a few quid for his nearest and dearest. 

In ambulance-chasing lawyer-land, there's no such thing as 'closure'. So, now that the Savile purse has been emptied, it's time too move onto richer pickings. The possibilities are endless 
Meanwhile, where it counts 

Will Dux admit how many of her claims got through ? Let's see shall we ?
You can put the checkbook away now Jim. Rest in the peace you deserve !

Thursday, 21 July 2016

Payday Pt 1

It's that day guys and gals ! The Savile compensation claims will be decided today, as I type although Justice Warren is probably having his lunch now (12.56 gmt) The Justice You Gov site which publishes the UK courts Daily Listings, was down this morning, but little old me, found the case on another
 I've no idea why the application hearing is described as being held 'in private', my sources tell me otherwise, but suffice to say, it's happening and no one in the media seems to be interested. NO-ONE !
So, that leaves me to spread the word as best I can ! I think it was Exaro news who claimed that a blogger with just 2000 followers, could have as much influence or summat like that, than the mainstream media. Well, guess what ?
 And, just look at the account name of my 2000th yesterday
 Blimey folks, there are more things in heaven and earth and all that, but what happened later in the day 
 Exaro 'news' are kaput, how the hell did that happen ? These were front-line (behind a keyboard) soldiers in the Savile Gestapo Press wing. Obviously, exaggeration shit-stirrer's, had gone a Bridge too Far, had some of the more powerful members of an 'establishment' that they have attacked so maliciously, finally had enough ? Who knows, I'm just glad they've finally got what they deserve, 'Next' as Jimmy said to Louis in 1999. 

One such NEXT might well be Liz Dux, Slater Gordon and all the others who have feasted on a dead man for the last four years. Strangely silent on the most recent Savile event, even their press release updates don't appear to have been 'updated' since Liz still had 170 claimants ! 
 Dux wasn't slow in getting in on the Savile free-for-all. From the get-go, she had 'dozens' of alleged 'victims' and she knew exactly who her lot would be putting the squeeze on once Jimmy's few million were gone !
 Dux knew that there would be hurdles for any would-be claimant's lawyer's to navigate. The courts don't like to appear as though they just give other people's money away, willy nilly !
 And while Jimmy's friends, no doubt still in shock a few weeks after Exposure, were telling it like it was with the financially challenged Savile, ridiculous claims were being peddled, including some nonsense involving a Rolls Royce
 Moor Larkin covered this not once but several times in his wonderful blog (obviously, not as wonderful as mine cos I've got 2000 followers now) 
 JUST THREE days after Exposure mind you 

But, how many of these claims will pass muster with Justice Warren today ? I won't judge his book by his cover, I'll wait and see what he says in his judgement 

 Curiously enough, another great blogger (much greater than me cos he's got lots more followers) barrister Matthew Scott published this fine piece about a man, a hero no less, who served time in prison on the basis of claims that turned out to be demonstrably false, once the liar himself attempted the bridge too far via the CIVIL court ! Snork as we say on twitter !

It's 2.06 pm gmt now, I wonder how many of Ms Dux's claims have come good for her clients ? She'll get her fee regardless ! 



Sunday, 17 July 2016

Driving everyone except Savile

Goodness gracious, someone's been busy in one : lower than sewer level rag, to have unearthed this one. I haven't skimmed the dame report recently, but I think I'll go out on a limb and accept that this guy won't be in it
 Niven Sinclair who was 81 in the above picture, taken in 2005,  so he'll be about 92 now, a fitting candidate for the Savile Gestapo press wing to harass. 
 Another 'ex-chaffeur' ? But to be fair, Mr Sinclair does have a past, a past that seems to have alluded them at the BBC who contracted his firm to get their guests to the studios on time, in 1977. 
No mention of Savile, the, lower than sewer have bigger fish on their minds, for this one
It's kind of hard to discern who is the intended target for the Savile Gestapo press wing's latest. But, I think we can safely say that it's the BBC, with a little bit of the 'establishment' thrown in. 

But, why would the Savile Gestapo independent dame's 'probe' have identified this story ? Her remit, terms of reference, call it what you will, was focused on light entertainment, specifically any show connected with Jimmy Savile. Perish the thought, she'd be instructed to go a burrowing into the high-brow end of things, like election night ! 
You have to laugh at the old boys stories, when he thought it was safe to tell them back in 2005 that is
His firm managed to get the great and good, to the studios, on time that election year. 
 Back in 1977, Sinclair had done his time, and appears not to have any further convictions since 1971. He wasn't even directly employed by the BBC, yet here he is, in the middle of the Savile gestapo stitch-up. And, best thing about it, it's all Jimmy's fault 
No, you've been 'dragged into this' because the, lower than sewer, Savile press wing, are out to destroy as many dead men's good names as they can, and they don't care who suffers as a result !