Ms Dux unsurprisingly did NOT respond to my question about what was and what wasn't said in the High Court last Tuesday ! But her firm did publisher this on November 6th 2014 by way of an update on the case !
But what of the 'fraudulent claims' Ms Dux. What do you not say about them ?
'considerable amount of scrutiny by independent experts' ! Pray tell us more about this 'scrutiny' and the 'experts' you have used for the task Ms Dux !
I seem to recall Peter Garsden blabbing on about the 'checks and balances' his firm would apply to claims submitted to his firm. Leigh Day Solicitors also confirmed that all claimants would have to supply 'credible evidence' that they had been 'abused'
But I've covered the same in previous blog posts have I not ?
The 'scheme' has FAILED and no amount of false gesticulations of grief for the claimants will pass muster with the High Court Appeal Judges. Well, at least that's what I hope !
Only 22 out of 58 ? How many will be 'accepted' when proper 'scrutiny' is allowed ?